snowcrash+spamassassin writes:
> > > (1) how do we verify that the compiled rules are working? is a
> > > 'healthy' --lint sufficient?
> >
> > Well, it's a bit tricky -- run a --lint, and look out for lines like this:
> >
> > [15144] dbg: rules: running one_line_body tests; score so far=0
> > [151
> (1) how do we verify that the compiled rules are working? is a
> 'healthy' --lint sufficient?
Well, it's a bit tricky -- run a --lint, and look out for lines like this:
[15144] dbg: rules: running one_line_body tests; score so far=0
[15144] dbg: zoom: run_body_fast_scan for body_0 start
[15144
Justin Mason writes:
>
> snowcrash+spamassassin writes:
> > some questions about sa-compile usage:
> >
> > (1) how do we verify that the compiled rules are working? is a
> > 'healthy' --lint sufficient?
>
> Well, it's a bit tricky -- run a --lint, and look out for lines like this:
um, a --lint
snowcrash+spamassassin writes:
> some questions about sa-compile usage:
>
> (1) how do we verify that the compiled rules are working? is a
> 'healthy' --lint sufficient?
Well, it's a bit tricky -- run a --lint, and look out for lines like this:
[15144] dbg: rules: running one_line_body tests; s
