> On Feb 12, 2015, at 14.09, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> On 2/11/2015 7:25 PM, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>> i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok.
>
> It's ok.
>
> Overall, I agree. I tested on a devel box and running sa-compile does have
> an rm line but did l
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:09:00 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 2/11/2015 7:25 PM, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
> > i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok.
>
> It's ok.
>
> Overall, I agree. I tested on a devel box and running sa-compile
> does have an rm line but did
On 2/11/2015 7:25 PM, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok.
It's ok.
Overall, I agree. I tested on a devel box and running sa-compile does
have an rm line but did leave these files listed below.
Because /tmp is a considered auto cle
i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok.
> On Feb 04, 2015, at 09.19, btb wrote:
>
> hi-
>
> i happened to notice a bunch of old files in /tmp/, related to spamassassin.
> after a bit of testing, it looks like sa-compile isn't cleaning up after
> itself?
>
> >ls -alH /tmp/
>
