Dave Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>
>> (who on earth still uses SRV records for anything?)
>
>
> Actually, I'm told it's used a lot for windoze services (active dir?)
Ok, who that actually uses a real DNS server. :)
Dave Stern wrote:
As to the format spamc -d 1.2.3.4,10 2.3.4.5,10
That was from a google search. I believe that allows you to specify
timeouts
per host rather than a more universal "-t".
I'm not aware of that being valid.
In any case, anything beyond a single host would either not fail to
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
Dave Stern wrote:
I'm trying to get SA working by remote connections and don't see it
consistantly working.
Users kick off SA in their .procmailrc on our mail server which can't
handle
a more recent version of SA so we only have v2.64 installed locally.
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
[snip..]
> (who on earth still uses SRV records for anything?)
The 800 Lb Gorilla of Redmond. ;)
Most modern Kerberos clients will use them to find KDCs
if properly set up.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
College
Dave Stern wrote:
> I'm trying to get SA working by remote connections and don't see it
> consistantly working.
>
> Users kick off SA in their .procmailrc on our mail server which can't
> handle
> a more recent version of SA so we only have v2.64 installed locally.
> (Don't
> ask)
>
> What I'd like
