On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 17:32 +0100, Marc Patermann wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
> > Given the already existing positive check, the easiest way is this:
> >
> > meta NON_PMS_Spam_DB ! PMS_Spam_DB
> > score NON_PMS_Spam_DB -0.1
>
> Thanks! That's what I searched for. And much easier t
RW schrieb:
I think the test needs to end in /m if you want to use ^ otherwise it'll
see all the headers as one big string and only match when it's the first
header.
I tried so much, it must have been gone by the time I was testing.
But Karsten already helped me out.
Thanks
Marc
Karsten,
Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
Given the already existing positive check, the easiest way is this:
meta NON_PMS_Spam_DB ! PMS_Spam_DB
score NON_PMS_Spam_DB -0.1
Thanks! That's what I searched for. And much easier than a regex.
For more information and a introductory guide, see
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:04:28 +0100
Marc Patermann wrote:
> I haven't figured out yet how to check for a header not existing in
> the mail.
> I tried
>
> header NON_PMS_Spam_DB ALL =~ /^(?:PMS-Spam-DB\:)/
> score NON_PMS_Spam_DB -0.1
>
> but the test does not fail, if the header does exit.
>
>
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 14:04 +0100, Marc Patermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my provider relays my mail and does spam checking with header tagging.
>
> I want to create rules to check for the tag headers and score them:
> - positive for existing headers
> - negative for non existing headers.
>
> The first
