On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:47:06 -0500
David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using spamassassin 3.4.1 and trying to tighten up my antispam
> measures. I've enabled the relay country plugin which also has it's
> supporting module of Geo-IP. This is on a FreeBSD system.
You probably need to enable the
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:18:14 -0500
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 22 Nov 2016, at 0:48, Pedro David Marco wrote:
>
> > Thanks Bill,
> >> . I don't know why some spammers do this sort of lame
> >> Received fakery, since it fingerprints their mail as spam, but it
> >> has been a fairly common practice fo
On 22 Nov 2016, at 0:48, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Thanks Bill,
. I don't know why some spammers do this sort of lame
Received fakery, since it fingerprints their mail as spam, but it has
been a fairly common practice for a long time.
But SA did not trigger any rule about the forgering...
I'
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 05:48:29 + (UTC)
Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Thanks Bill,
> >. I don't know why some spammers do this sort of lame
> >Received fakery, since it fingerprints their mail as spam, but it
> >has been a fairly common practice for a long time.
> But SA did not trigger any rule
Thanks Bill,
>. I don't know why some spammers do this sort of lame
>Received fakery, since it fingerprints their mail as spam, but it has
>been a fairly common practice for a long time.
But SA did not trigger any rule about the forgering... and debug mode does not
showany message about unparse
On 21 Nov 2016, at 17:54, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Hi,
i have spam emails with a Received line like this:
Received: by 9-30-239-23.uocdn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 693A0C56B
with (unknown [158.69.130.12]) ; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:06:55 -0300
there is no parsing perl code for lines like this in
On 2015-10-14 18:31, Mark Martinec wrote:
Check your database:
$ spamassassin --lint -D metadata' 2>&1 | fgrep RelayCountry
should yield something like:
Oct 15 01:26:45.584 [78315] dbg: metadata: RelayCountry:
Using database: Geo::IP GEO-106FREE 20151006 Build 1
Copyright (c) 2015 MaxMi
2015-10-15 00:09, a...@satester.com wrote:
Does the Geo::IP package need
to be recompiled for the change to go into effect?
No.
Use of uninitialized value $hasStructureInfo in numeric eq (==)
at (eval 31) line 5520
According to comments in Geo/IP.pm your GeoIP database files
must be very o
Hi, I cannot get the fix below to work. Does the Geo::IP package need
to be recompiled for the change to go into effect? If so, any tips on
how to recompile would be greatly appreciated.
Allen
a...@satester.com
On 2015-10-14 12:04, George Ficzeri wrote:
This?
https://github.com/maxmind/geo
Thanks for the reply George. We tried that link yesterday and made the
change as described with no results. We restarted mailscanner but
nothing else. Maybe I need to restart our MTA or other daemon.
Allen
a...@bandwise.com
On 2015-10-14 12:04, George Ficzeri wrote:
This?
https://github.c
This?
https://github.com/maxmind/geoip-api-perl/pull/22
If you click 'Files changed' you'll see the path, and see the fix.
On 10/14/15 11:49 AM, a...@satester.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We activated the relay country plugin yesterday. As part of the process
> we did a yum install perl-Geo-IP. Now w
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Lemke"
To:
Sent: Friday, 2010/March/26 06:59
Subject: Re: Relay Country on SA 3.3.1
Kaleb Hosie wrote:
Before I upgraded to 3.3.1 I had the relay country ruleset installed and
enabled. In my local.cf file, here's a few lines
Kaleb Hosie wrote:
>
> Before I upgraded to 3.3.1 I had the relay country ruleset installed and
> enabled. In my local.cf file, here's a few lines I have:
>
> header RELAYCOUNTRY_CN X-relay-countries =~ /CN/
> describe RELAYCOUNTRY_CN Relayed through China
> score RELAYCOUNTRY_CN 5
>
> add_hea
Terry Soucy wrote:
You might want to try asking that question in a mailing list specific
for qmail. Check www.qmail.org for access to support and forums.
Also check the Life with qmail book, available for download at
http://www.lifewithqmail.org, which addresses this question.
Terry
Terry Sou
You might want to try asking that question in a mailing list specific
for qmail. Check www.qmail.org for access to support and forums.
Also check the Life with qmail book, available for download at
http://www.lifewithqmail.org, which addresses this question.
Terry
Terry Soucy, Systems Analyst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> John Rudd wrote:
>>> D.J. wrote:
On 11/10/06, Patrick Sneyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get this warning: plugin: failed to create instance of p
Hi,
Can anyone let me know the clear installation and configuration of this FuzzyOcr ?
thanks in advance
decoder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
D.J. wrote:
On 11/10/06, Patrick Sneyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get this warning: plugin: failed to create instance of plugin
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker: Can't locate object
method "new" via pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
> D.J. wrote:
>> On 11/10/06, Patrick Sneyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I get this warning: plugin: failed to create instance of plugin
>>> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker: Can't locate object
>>> method "new" via p
D.J. wrote:
On 11/10/06, Patrick Sneyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get this warning:
plugin: failed to create instance of plugin
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker: Can't locate object method
"new" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker" at (eval
26) line 1.
(This is my
On 11/10/06, Patrick Sneyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get this warning:plugin: failed to create instance of pluginMail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker: Can't locate object method"new" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker" at (eval
26) line 1.(This is my own build of SA 3.1.
I get this warning:
plugin: failed to create instance of plugin
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker: Can't locate object method
"new" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker" at (eval
26) line 1.
(This is my own build of SA 3.1.7 on Max OS X Server 10.4 ppc)
It seems to
John Rudd wrote:
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
I've put up a new version of Relay checker, in
...
I expect I might, at some point, switch from using a dynamic score in
the plugin, to a normal score. But that's the only change I expect
to make, aside from bug fixes (if there are a
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
I've put up a new version of Relay checker, in
...
I expect I might, at some point, switch from using a dynamic score in
the plugin, to a normal score. But that's the only change I expect to
make, aside from bug fixes (if there are any), and/or a swit
John Rudd wrote:
I've put up a new version of Relay checker, in
...
I expect I might, at some point, switch from using a dynamic score in
the plugin, to a normal score. But that's the only change I expect to
make, aside from bug fixes (if there are any), and/or a switch to using
Net::DNS.
Message -
From: "Dylan Bouterse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:28 PM
Subject: RE: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
I did a couple of times. :(
-Original Message-
From: Billy Huddleston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, N
I did a couple of times. :(
> -Original Message-
> From: Billy Huddleston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:20 PM
> To: Dylan Bouterse; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
>
> You may
You may want to download new RelayChecker.pm file... you may have messed it
up previously..
If you still have problems let me know..
- Original Message -
From: "Dylan Bouterse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: Rela
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:05 PM
> To: Dylan Bouterse
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
>
> On Wed, 1 Nov 20
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> # headerRELAY_CHECKER eval:relay_checker()
> # describe RELAY_CHECKER Check relay for DNS/Hostname issues.
> to:
>if ($nordns) {
>
> and when I run --lint I get the following errors:
>
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/RelayChecker.pm l
> -Original Message-
> From: Billy Huddleston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:58 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
>
> Attached is patch to allow scores to be
Attached is patch to allow scores to be done in the .cf file
--- RelayChecker.pm 2006-10-30 18:02:28.0 -0500
+++ ../RelayChecker.pm 2006-11-01 15:36:53.0 -0500
@@ -31,6 +31,12 @@
# headerRELAY_CHECKER eval:relay_checker()
# describe RELAY_CHECKER Check relay
John Rudd writes:
> Stuart Johnston wrote:
> > John Rudd wrote:
> >> Stuart Johnston wrote:
> >>> John Rudd wrote:
> 2) This sort of replaces the other set of rules I created, that did
> this with metarules instead of a plugin. This made some of the
> checks less useful. You pro
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
2) This sort of replaces the other set of rules I created, that did
this with metarules instead of a plugin. This made some of the
checks less useful. You probably don't need to use both methods.
So, what i
John Rudd wrote:
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
2) This sort of replaces the other set of rules I created, that did
this with metarules instead of a plugin. This made some of the
checks less useful. You probably don't need to use both methods.
So, what is the point of doing thi
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
2) This sort of replaces the other set of rules I created, that did
this with metarules instead of a plugin. This made some of the checks
less useful. You probably don't need to use both methods.
So, what is the point of doing this as a plugin inst
John Rudd wrote:
2) This sort of replaces the other set of rules I created, that did this
with metarules instead of a plugin. This made some of the checks less
useful. You probably don't need to use both methods.
So, what is the point of doing this as a plugin instead of using existing ru
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 03:23:21PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
> I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
...and here was me just working out how to get exim to check this,
and have SpamAssassin add a score, and your mail arrived :-)
> 1) no RDNS for the machines tha
John Rudd wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Hi,
Right off the bat I've disabled it. It, of course, hits on all mail
my local users send. That's not really acceptable in an ISP situation
so I've turned it off until tomorrow when I have the time to look at
the code and see i
Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
used to do in MimeDefang. The purpose of these checks is to try to
identify those messages that are likely to be coming directly (with no
intermediary mail server) from a zombie-bot,
John Rudd wrote:
I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
used to do in MimeDefang. The purpose of these checks is to try to
identify those messages that are likely to be coming directly (with no
intermediary mail server) from a zombie-bot, and are thus likely to
John Rudd wrote:
I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
used to do in MimeDefang. The purpose of these checks is to try to
identify those messages that are likely to be coming directly (with no
intermediary mail server) from a zombie-bot, and are thus likely to
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 6:23 PM
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
used to do in Mim
-Original Message-
From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 6:23 PM
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
used to do in MimeDefang. The purpose of
On Tuesday April 11 2006 23:17, Kelson wrote:
> mouss wrote:
> > - multiple "internal" hops at either sender or receiver (I have N
> > Received headers added by my own MTA. and for mail fetched from an MSP,
> > there are still more).
>
> Actually, if I'm reading this right, it's the number of I
Kelson wrote:
> Actually, if I'm reading this right, it's the number of IP hops
> between the sending server and the receiving server -- in other
> words, how many lines you'd see if you were on the receiving server
> and ran traceroute to the sending MTA.
Ah... that makes much more sense :)
--
Am Dienstag, 11. April 2006 22:28 schrieb mouss:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > mouss wrote:
> >> I would conjecture that most legitimate mail has two "real" hops
> >> (the sending MTA and the receiving MTA).
> >
> > That would be one hop.
>
> depends on how you count:
>
> MUA -> my MTA1 -> y
mouss wrote:
- multiple "internal" hops at either sender or receiver (I have N Received
headers added by my own MTA. and for mail fetched from an MSP, there are
still more).
Actually, if I'm reading this right, it's the number of IP hops between
the sending server and the receiving server -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mouss wrote:
I would conjecture that most legitimate mail has two "real" hops (the
sending MTA and the receiving MTA).
That would be one hop.
depends on how you count:
MUA -> my MTA1 -> your MTA -> your mailbox
that's two MTAs, so that's two hops. I prefe
mouss wrote:
> I would conjecture that most legitimate mail has two "real" hops (the
> sending MTA and the receiving MTA).
That would be one hop.
> What does one need to do to activate the relay country tests?
> We have the CPAN module installed and added this line to local.cf
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
>
> Do we need to add any scores or tests?
>
> We are not yet seeing any evidence that the test is bein
Jeff Koch wrote:
What does one need to do to activate the relay country tests? We have
the CPAN module installed and added this line to local.cf
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
I do not use that plugin, but I would uncomment the entry in init.pre
and not touch local.cf.
52 matches
Mail list logo
