Chris Santerre wrote:
-- Bizzaro-Chris (I know all of the real Chris's dark secrets!)
Bizarro! Bizarro! Bizarro!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> >
> > meta TOO_MANY_URIBLS URIBL_OB_SURBL && URIBL_JP_SURBL
> ..^ Modifier missing?
Err...uhh...what the heck was I thinking? :) Disregard the above. I'm
pouring myself another cup of coffee.
>
> > describe TOO_MANY_URIBLS On too many URIBLs
> > score TOO MANY_URIBLS2
Chris Santerre wrote:
>>1. I tried the following rule on some test emails:
>>
>>meta TOO_MANY_URIBLS URIBL_OB_SURBL && URIBL_JP_SURBL
>
> ..^ Modifier missing?
Modifier? What's a modifier?
While it might be more common to see someone using parentheses, AFAIK they
aren't re
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 6:40 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: question on meta rules
>
>
> Is there something special about meta rules?
> Could someone explain what appear to be anomolies be
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:39:40PM -0700, Anthony McCarthy wrote:
> meta TOO_MANY_URIBLS URIBL_OB_SURBL && URIBL_JP_SURBL
> describe TOO_MANY_URIBLS On too many URIBLs
> score TOO MANY_URIBLS2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
^ ^-- not the same as the rulename above
