Re: qmail auth mail received as spam

2006-05-03 Thread hamann . w
Hi Jason, it seems the problem is caused by this set of headers: >> Received: from 84.153.210.199 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by shared3 (envelope-from >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, uid 0) with qmail-scanner-2.01 >> (clamdscan: 0.88.1/1426. hbedv: 6.34.1.27/6.34.1.12. spammassassin: 3.1.1 >> Clear:RC:0(84

Re: qmail auth mail received as spam

2006-05-03 Thread Jason Haar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > I have made my setup such that auth'd users still have their outgoing mails > scanned. > After all they are potentially running windows and could be sending virus. > > I do not use SA within qmail-scanner at all, but rather run it before mail is > delivered to > the reci

Re: qmail auth mail received as spam

2006-05-02 Thread hamann . w
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > So what happens: a mail is sent via an authenticated session, to a qmail / >> > qmail-scanner >> > setup running at mydomain.de >> > >> >> By default Qmail-Scanner specifically doesn't pass locally generated or >> authenticated mail to SpamAssassin. Have you

Re: qmail auth mail received as spam

2006-05-02 Thread jdow
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jason Haar wrote: HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D isn't part of standard SA - where did that come from? It appears to come from: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/88_FVGT_headers.cf header HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+ rdns=[^ ]+\d{1,3}[^

Re: qmail auth mail received as spam

2006-05-02 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Jason Haar wrote: I guess a more generic question would be: how do sites handle calling SA for validated-but-remote local users? Qmail-Scanner defaults to *not* calling SA - is that what most others do too? If not, how do you handle the fact those users are (by definition) going to be on DUL lis

Re: qmail auth mail received as spam

2006-05-02 Thread Jason Haar
I guess a more generic question would be: how do sites handle calling SA for validated-but-remote local users? Qmail-Scanner defaults to *not* calling SA - is that what most others do too? If not, how do you handle the fact those users are (by definition) going to be on DUL lists? -- Cheers Jas

Re: qmail auth mail received as spam

2006-05-02 Thread Matt Kettler
Jason Haar wrote: > HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D isn't part of standard SA - where did that come from? > It appears to come from: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/88_FVGT_headers.cf header HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DX-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+ rdns=[^ ]+\d{1,3}[^0-9]\d{1,3}[^0-9]\d{1,3}[^0-9]\d{1,

Re: qmail auth mail received as spam

2006-05-02 Thread Jason Haar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So what happens: a mail is sent via an authenticated session, to a qmail / > qmail-scanner > setup running at mydomain.de > By default Qmail-Scanner specifically doesn't pass locally generated or authenticated mail to SpamAssassin. Have you overridden that? If so,