On 20.06.08 13:20, raulbe wrote:
> Couple new errors now :(
>
> config: cannot write to /var/spool/uucp/.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such
> file or directory
>
>
> spamd[19476]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> for uucp:10
there are independent on those you reported before... S
On Fri, June 20, 2008 22:38, raulbe wrote:
> Were can i find these settings?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes
plenty of info there :)
> would it be in spamassassin.bayes_rules or
> 23_bayes.cf
no in local.cf or user_prefs
Benny Pedersen
Need more we
raulbe wrote:
Were can i find these settings?
would it be in spamassassin.bayes_rules or
23_bayes.cf
As with all site-local settings, the Bayes options should go in a .cf
file in your site config dir - typically either /etc/mail/spamassassin/
or /etc/spamassassin/. local.cf is usually conve
Were can i find these settings?
would it be in spamassassin.bayes_rules or
23_bayes.cf
Thanks
Kris Deugau wrote:
>
> raulbe wrote:
>> What I did was turn off auto_learn and that cleared up the error. So
>> would
>> doing this would it affect how bayes works or?
>
> Well, yes. All Bayes t
raulbe wrote:
What I did was turn off auto_learn and that cleared up the error. So would
doing this would it affect how bayes works or?
Well, yes. All Bayes training will now have to be done manually.
What's usually a slightly better idea for a global Bayes database is to
set these Bayes opt
Couple new errors now :(
config: cannot write to /var/spool/uucp/.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such
file or directory
spamd[19476]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for uucp:10
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 20.06.08 08:18, raulbe wrote:
>> Now if I can figure out wh
What I did was turn off auto_learn and that cleared up the error. So would
doing this would it affect how bayes works or?
Also doing the editing in
confQUEUE_LA
confREFUSE_LA
confDELAY_LA
totaly cleared up the prefork: server reached --max-children setting,
consider raising it error i was ge
On Fredag, 20/6 2008, 16:55, raulbe wrote:
> So should the entry look like this?
> confQUEUE_LA=1
> confREFUSE_LA=1
this is based on load avage
> confDELAY_LA =1
this is based on deley secunds (keep this litte more then your scan time pr
mail)
with 1 you scan every email/spam in just one sec,
On 20.06.08 08:18, raulbe wrote:
> Now if I can figure out why I keep getting the bayes.lock error any clues?
> Jun 20 11:02:41 ws096 spamd[20261]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
> /home/nuonce/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
do you have autolearning turned on? what about j
THanks so much for the help
Now if I can figure out why I keep getting the bayes.lock error any clues?
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/nuonce/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W:
lock failed: File exists
Jun 20 11:02:41 ws096 spamd[20261]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/home/nuonce/spamass
On 20.06.08 07:55, raulbe wrote:
> So should the entry look like this?
>
>
> confQUEUE_LA=1
> confREFUSE_LA=1
> confDELAY_LA =1
as you wish, I have those higher. My machine can handle load of 1.0 very
well and so I expect yours. I have those set to (3,5,unset).
instead of DELAY_LA I use
FEATU
So should the entry look like this?
confQUEUE_LA=1
confREFUSE_LA=1
confDELAY_LA =1
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 19.06.08 13:54, raulbe wrote:
>> were do I find these lines?
>
>> confQUEUE_LA
>> confREFUSE_LA
>> confDELAY_LA
>
>> I looked in both the sendmail.cf file and the send
On 19.06.08 13:54, raulbe wrote:
> were do I find these lines?
> confQUEUE_LA
> confREFUSE_LA
> confDELAY_LA
> I looked in both the sendmail.cf file and the sendmail.mc file and didnt
> see them?
you'll see them in cf.README(.gz) and you can add them to sendmail.mc
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
were do I find these lines?
adjust
confQUEUE_LA
confREFUSE_LA
confDELAY_LA
I looked in both the sendmail.cf file and the sendmail.mc file and didnt
see them?
thanks
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>
> On Torsdag, 19/6 2008, 18:36, raulbe wrote:
>>
>> I am using sendmail as my mta
>
> http://ww
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, raulbe wrote:
>
> I am using sendmail as my mta
>
>
> # rpm -q sendmail
> sendmail-8.13.1-3.2.el4
>
>
> What wierd is that the error clears up and then starts again after a while.
> Also I noticed we are getting hit with a considerable amount of spam. Plus I
> think our spamas
On Torsdag, 19/6 2008, 18:37, raulbe wrote:
> I also notice this error in the maillog
> spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found, or set
> to root, falling back to nobody
make a bug on this issue to your distro, its not really a bug but it could be
solved in the rpm f
On Torsdag, 19/6 2008, 18:36, raulbe wrote:
>
> I am using sendmail as my mta
http://www.sendmail.org/m4/tweaking_config.html
adjust
confQUEUE_LA
confREFUSE_LA
confDELAY_LA
delay is default 0, but in your case it should be little more then what time
spamd uses pr scan msgs
all the abouve sett
I also notice this error in the maillog
spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found, or set
to root, falling back to nobody
raulbe wrote:
>
> I am using sendmail as my mta
>
>
> # rpm -q sendmail
> sendmail-8.13.1-3.2.el4
>
>
> What wierd is that the error clea
I am using sendmail as my mta
# rpm -q sendmail
sendmail-8.13.1-3.2.el4
What wierd is that the error clears up and then starts again after a while.
Also I noticed we are getting hit with a considerable amount of spam. Plus I
think our spamassassin version is old
# rpm -q spamassassin
spamassa
On Wed, June 18, 2008 20:36, raulbe wrote:
> What I did was edit etc/sysconfig/spamassassin and up the max from 8 to 10
> now that worked for a while but now the error has returned. What could be
> causing the server not to be able to handle all the processes?
problem might be that you mta acce
20 matches
Mail list logo
