Re: prefork: child states: BBBBBBB

2008-03-07 Thread fchan
Hi, What this means there there are more incoming messages than spamd daemon can handle. You have you need to change the spamd --max-children to an higher setting. You need also make sure you system can handle the extra children processes so not to lock up your system due to an spam attack. I

Re: prefork: child states: BBBBBBB

2008-03-07 Thread Johann Spies
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:04:07PM +0530, Agnello George wrote: > I see in my log the following what does it mean ?? > > Fri Mar 7 21:07:12 2008 [11800] info: prefork: child states: BBB > Fri Mar 7 21:07:12 2008 [11800] info: prefork: server reached --max-children > setting, consider raisin

Re: prefork: child states: II

2007-09-30 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 10:58 +0100, Obantec Support wrote: > now using spamd seeing this in maillog > > Sep 29 10:37:18 proteus2 spamd[6801]: rules: meta test FM__TIMES_2 has > dependency 'FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D' with a zero score > Sep 29 10:37:18 proteus2 spamd[6801]: rules: meta test FM_SEX_HO

Re: Prefork Child States

2007-01-12 Thread Rick Macdougall
Marc Perkel wrote: What do the letters IBK mean in the prefork child states line. SA seems to be using more ram than usual and I'm trying to figure out why. i - idle b - busy k - being killed (over max-child or max-connections, etc) HTH, Rick

Re: Prefork Child States

2007-01-12 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Marc Perkel wrote: What do the letters IBK mean in the prefork child states line. SA seems to be using more ram than usual and I'm trying to figure out why. I Bought Kalua, or Idle Busy Killing, whichever you prefer. Daryl

Re: prefork: child states

2006-11-23 Thread Thiago LPS
I think that mean the usage of childrem.. something like: BUZZY(B) and IDLE (I) if you got B probably all the cildrem are buzzy... and you cpu load is really high try to compare it.. :) On 11/23/06, Rejaine Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After upgrade my SA to 3.1.x version