Re: performance question

2006-09-27 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
sting) and fast disks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Tom. > > > > > > Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 27/09/2006 11:33 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject:Re: performance questi

Re: performance question

2006-09-27 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > As we have seen the amount of incoming mail increase by 25% in the last > few months, our customer is willing to invest in an extra mail relay. > I was thinking about a system with Sun's T1 chipset, (like the sunfire > T1000), I'm thinking the t

Re: performance question

2006-09-27 Thread tomvo
Subject: Re: performance question [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I would like your opinion if our mailrelay is properly tuned: > > I have a mailrelay (sendmail / mimedefang / spamassassin with fuzzyocr, > razor and dcc) running on a Sun V20Z with 6 GB Ram and 2

Re: performance question

2006-09-27 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I would like your opinion if our mailrelay is properly tuned: > > I have a mailrelay (sendmail / mimedefang / spamassassin with fuzzyocr, > razor and dcc) running on a Sun V20Z with 6 GB Ram and 2 AMD 1.8Ghz cpu's > on Solaris 10. > it curren

Re: performance question

2006-09-27 Thread Martin Hepworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like your opinion if our mailrelay is properly tuned: I have a mailrelay (sendmail / mimedefang / spamassassin with fuzzyocr, razor and dcc) running on a Sun V20Z with 6 GB Ram and 2 AMD 1.8Ghz cpu's on Solaris 10. it currently handles 95000 mails per da