Re: per-user bayes

micah anderson wrote: Kris Deugau writes: There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your Bayes database, and most users will i

Re: per-user bayes

hg user skrev den 2020-12-09 08:57: I believe that a SA plugin (like bayes) is able to know the envelope MAIL FROM and RCPT TO values... is it correct? If it is possible we "just" have to modify the bayes plugin provide this patch first and ask later :=) bayes does not fokus on specifik header

Re: per-user bayes

On 2020-12-09 9:48 am, deano-spamassas...@areyes.com wrote: > On 2020-12-09 4:41 am, @lbutlr wrote: > > On 08 Dec 2020, at 13:54, micah anderson wrote: > Kris Deugau writes: There will only be one database and > set of tables, but one of the fields in each table is the user identifier. >

Re: per-user bayes

On 2020-12-09 4:41 am, @lbutlr wrote: > On 08 Dec 2020, at 13:54, micah anderson wrote: > >> Kris Deugau writes: > There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in > each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on > a large system, t

Re: per-user bayes

On 08 Dec 2020, at 13:54, micah anderson wrote: > Kris Deugau writes: >> There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields >> in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full >> per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your

Re: per-user bayes

I believe that a SA plugin (like bayes) is able to know the envelope MAIL FROM and RCPT TO values... is it correct? If it is possible we "just" have to modify the bayes plugin On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:13 PM Benny Pedersen wrote: > micah anderson skrev den 2020-12-08 21:54: > > Kris Deugau writ

Re: per-user bayes

micah anderson skrev den 2020-12-08 21:54: Kris Deugau writes: There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your Bayes databas

Re: per-user bayes

Kris Deugau writes: > There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields > in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full > per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your > Bayes database, and most users will idle below the

Re: per-user bayes

Benoit Panizzon wrote: Hi This may help I sort of have the same issue. Unfortunately that does not help, it merely explains how to store bayes data in a database. But there is still only one 'global' databa

Re: per-user bayes

On 08 Dec 2020, at 08:36, Benoit Panizzon wrote: > Adding the list back to CC as I believe this is an interesting topic > many have pondered over. Forgot to fix the reply to on this list for some reason. Fixed now. > Yes, I see that is states 'per user' but I still don't see, how that > 'bayes u

Re: per-user bayes

Hi Adding the list back to CC as I believe this is an interesting topic many have pondered over. Yes, I see that is states 'per user' but I still don't see, how that 'bayes user' is being set on a per recipient base. On the email platform there is ONE config file for spamassassin. So if I set th

Re: per-user bayes

Hi > This may help > > I sort of have the same issue. Unfortunately that does not help, it merely explains how to store bayes data in a database. But there is still only one 'global' database on your mail platf

Re: per-user bayes

On 07 Dec 2020, at 13:56, micah anderson wrote: > A per-user setup would let each user do their own thing, but I don't see > how I can do that because our system doesn't have individual system > users and I don't see that there are options in the bayes sql > configuration or per-user tables possib

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: >>> Two obvious things to check: 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the >>> aliases database? >> Positive. The mail is delivered to the right place, it just

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:24:18 -0500 David King wrote: > >> I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user > >> 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: > > Two obvious things to check: > > 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database? > > Posit

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

>> I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user >> 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: > Two obvious things to check: > 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database? Positive. The mail is delivered to the right place, it just doesn't get

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 00:39 -0500, David King wrote: > I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user > 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: > Two obvious things to check: 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database? 2) As there is more t

Re: per user bayes db: auto_expiry problem --->> SOLVED

Hi Folks, it's been a while I asked here how to solve bayes timeout and spamd child timeout problems. Well, at least for our environment I have found a solution that seems to work. Also, I have a theory about the reason for this bayes timeout and spamd child timeout problems and I'd like to know w

Re: per user bayes db: auto_expiry problem, spamd child timeout, very long scantimes

> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Some emails have a scantime of more than 900 seconds. >> >> I do not see a relation to a huge load on the SpamAssassin Servers >> (I have 2 of them). The timeout problems happen when there is >> small load (10 out of 20 spamds marked Busy) as well

Re: per user bayes db: auto_expiry problem, spamd child timeout, very long scantimes

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Some emails have a scantime of more than 900 seconds. > > I do not see a relation to a huge load on the SpamAssassin Servers > (I have 2 of them). The timeout problems happen when there is > small load (10 out of 20 spamds marked Busy) as well as whe

Re: Per-user bayes filter on site-wide spamassassin setup

Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote: How can I make spamassassin read the bayes database for the user that is recieving the mail. Is this even a good idea? Should I use a central database instead? With amavis you only have the option of using a single site wide bayes database. -- Scott Russell

Re: Per-User - Bayes Learning

On Monday, January 2, 2006 at 3:56:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: > At 10:00 PM 1/1/2006, Duane Hill wrote: >>Hello All, >> >>I have e-mail accounts that have been sending Spam to a specific >>e-mail address as an attachment for some time now. Before they were >>manually gone t

Re: Per-User - Bayes Learning

At 10:00 PM 1/1/2006, Duane Hill wrote: Hello All, I have e-mail accounts that have been sending Spam to a specific e-mail address as an attachment for some time now. Before they were manually gone through as I didn't have anything specific set up on a per-account basis. Now that I