ubject: Re: outlook email is beeing flag
as spam...
here u go, hope this shed some lights...:Received: from
deskandys (192-168-240-205. [192.168.240.205]) by
smtpserver. (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k5QGgDN01015;
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:42:13 -0400Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:42:0
> -1.8 ALL_TRUSTEDPassed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
> -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
> [score: 0.3371]
> 0.1 HTML_90_100BODY: Message is 90% to 100% HTML
> 1.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 BODY: HTML:
here u go, hope this shed some lights...:
Received: from deskandys (192-168-240-205. [192.168.240.205])
by smtpserver. (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k5QGgDN01015;
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:42:13 -0400
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:42:00 -0400
...
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Virus
> On Monday 26 June 2006 22:17, Screaming Eagle took the
> opportunity to write:
> > header info:
> > Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:42:00 -0400
> > X-Spam-Virus: No
> > X-Spam-Flag: YES
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on ...
> > X-Spam-Level: ***
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes,
On Monday 26 June 2006 22:17, Screaming Eagle took the opportunity to write:
> header info:
> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:42:00 -0400
> X-Spam-Virus: No
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on ...
> X-Spam-Level: ***
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.6 required
header info:
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:42:00 -0400
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on ...
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.6 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50,
HTML_90_100,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28,HTML_MESSAGE,MSGID_
> Any pointers on this: "real solution is to find what's causing
> the rule to fire and fix the Outlook setup so it doesn't trigger
> it"?. Thanks.
How about posting the message headers. The last three rules that fired
(MSID_DOLLARS, RATWARE_MS_HASH, and RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME) all indicate
a pro
Wow,
I did not know this can break so many aspects of spamasassin, thank you
for the information. I have set trusted_network on my local.cf file, I
have set all except one network which have a netmask of
255.255.255.192, how should I handle this? Should it be like
/255.255.255.192? I have set it l
email is beeing flag
as spam...
Honestly, those Outlook rules should be
firing on a normal Outlook user, or they're scored way to high. I use Outlook
every day and AFAIK, I've never had my e-mail rejected or tagged with those
rules.
It's probably time to look a
I suggested before that you had a problem with your trusted_hosts
configuration. The headers below confirms that you have a problem with
your trusted_hosts configuration.
The solution isn't to adjust the score on ALL_TRUSTED. The solution
is to correctly set trusted_hosts so that the rule
Any pointers on this: "real solution is to find what's causing the rule to fire and fix
the Outlook setup so it doesn't trigger it"?. Thanks.
Honestly, those Outlook rules should be
firing on a normal Outlook user, or they're scored way to high. I use Outlook
every day and AFAIK, I've never had my e-mail rejected or tagged with those
rules.
It's probably time to look at what is being
generated by these specific problem users that tr
> Does any one know how to handle this?:
> found I cuold adjust ALL_TRUSTED so this won't be mark as spam, but what about
> other email being sent by outlook from outside? Any idea?
http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/
13 matches
Mail list logo
