Re: optimization failing--fixed

2006-01-13 Thread Anne Ramey
Anne Ramey wrote: I'm installed SA 3.1 with Amavisd-new and postfix 2.2.5 on fedora core 3 and am having serious mail slowdowns, as much as and hour. I've figure out it's SA because the SA check as taking 8-12 seconds, which was about 75%+ of the processing. I've been trying to sort through

Re: optimization failing

2006-01-13 Thread Anne Ramey
Anne Ramey wrote: Loren Wilton wrote: Basically only two possibilities: you're thrashing the poor box to death by running out of memory, or network tests are taking an age. Or maybe both. ok, I had a pyzor test timing out, but I've removed that, and it's still taking 6-15 seconds for th

Re: optimization failing

2006-01-13 Thread Anne Ramey
Loren Wilton wrote: Basically only two possibilities: you're thrashing the poor box to death by running out of memory, or network tests are taking an age. Or maybe both. ok, I had a pyzor test timing out, but I've removed that, and it's still taking 6-15 seconds for the SA check. How many

Re: optimization failing

2006-01-12 Thread Loren Wilton
Basically only two possibilities: you're thrashing the poor box to death by running out of memory, or network tests are taking an age. Or maybe both. How many children? What load average? How much memory on the machine? How much free memory? Do you have a local caching DNS for the various RBL

Re: optimization failing

2006-01-12 Thread Matt Kettler
Anne Ramey wrote: > I'm installed SA 3.1 with Amavisd-new and postfix 2.2.5 on fedora core 3 > and am having serious mail slowdowns, as much as and hour. I've figure > out it's SA because the SA check as taking 8-12 seconds, which was about > 75%+ of the processing. I've been trying to sort throug