Hi Karsten,
Am 2009-08-28 12:27:38, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> Which one do you refer to as "original"?
The Autoresponder I think, because your reply on 2009-08-28 03:34:23 was
the first I have gotten, so I assume, the message you have replyed to
was the OP.
> The original post is not spa
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 12:10 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hallo Karsten,
>
> is your spamassassin in holliday?
>
> Here, spamassassin has catched the original
> message and I have never seen it..
Which one do you refer to as "original"?
The original post is not spam, and should not be caught
Hallo Karsten,
is your spamassassin in holliday?
Here, spamassassin has catched the original
message and I have never seen it..
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with
Irish Online Help Desk wrote:
>
> When I send a test message for my broadcast email I am receiving “0.6
> HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation” in
> the spam score. It is a pretty basic email message with a few
> hyperlinks and a numbered list. Can you explain what may
See, this is one of the reasons why I prefer NOT to moderate through
posts by non-subscribers.
I am *seriously* trying hard not to use any words that are inappropriate
for a public list. Funnily enough, I can't even begin to explain how I
feel about trying to help you and getting that bloody reply
Not subscribed. You are missing the on-list replies. Well, if any
useful, given that post...
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 11:30 -0400, Irish Online Help Desk wrote:
> When I send a test message for my broadcast email I am receiving “0.6
> HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation”
On Wed 26 Aug 2009 05:30:31 PM CEST, Irish Online Help Desk wrote
When I send a test message for my broadcast email I am receiving "0.6
HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation" in the
spam score. It is a pretty basic email message with a few hyperlinks and a
numbered li
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
Heya,
wondering if somone got a rule for those.
For me it's too low volume to care.
see attached mail.
The sender isn't on any BL yet (might be in a few hours) , but the URL is
already on uribl.com. SA doesn't detect the "obfuscation" unfortunatly.
The bayes poiso
All
nice obsfu generator at..
http://sandgnat.com/cmos/cmos.jsp
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Scott A Crosby wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:34:13 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
A paper at the spam conference suggested using a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott A Crosby writes:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:34:13 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
>
> > A paper at the spam conference suggested using an Edit Distance algorithm
> > with very good results; the idea being, the edit distance from "
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:34:13 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> A paper at the spam conference suggested using an Edit Distance algorithm
> with very good results; the idea being, the edit distance from "cialis" to
> "C 1 a l | s" isn't as far as it is to "specialized" or so on.
>
>
--On Sunday, February 27, 2005 7:46 PM -0800 Loren Wilton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He has a point. A complicated regex is complicated, and that can mean
slow. It also by definition means "incomprehensible to humans", and so
has to be generated by a tool, and then not touched or looked at.
Than
Chris Santerre wrote:
> I remember that paper. I was impressed and sceptical at the same time. I
> could see it FPing a lot. One person in the crowd brought up Niagra vs. the
> V-drug word :)
>
> Cialis vs. Dial-Lisa
> ect..
That was MailFrontier, using the term lexigraphical distancing rat
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 10:34 AM
>To: Loren Wilton
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Obfuscation (was: Millions and Billions)
>
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton writes:
> Since a tool can generate the matching pattern and convert it to a re, it
> seems that a tool could in theory generate a matching pattern and convert it
> to something else that might be either more comprehensible or more
> effi
Hello Kenneth,
Sunday, February 27, 2005, 7:35:18 AM, you wrote:
KP> --On Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:07 PM -0500 Phil Barnett
KP> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i or l = [|ííiil1]
>> a = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> e = [eé3]
>> o = [o0]
KP> It seems like this is getting overly-complicated. Are there
> > I just question whether regex's are the right "complicated solution".
> >
> > How does Google or one of the dictionary sites guess the correct
spelling
> > for a misspelled word?
>
> Great, why don't you go see if google can guess the correct spelling for
>
> c l @ L i @ s
He has a point. A c
On Sunday 27 February 2005 06:31 pm, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Sunday, February 27, 2005 11:48 AM -0500 Phil Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > All you have requested here is for someone else to do the complicated
> > stuff and make it easy for you. Someone has to get the code as comple
--On Sunday, February 27, 2005 11:48 AM -0500 Phil Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
All you have requested here is for someone else to do the complicated
stuff and make it easy for you. Someone has to get the code as complex
as it needs to be. If not you, then the guy that makes the library y
On Sunday 27 February 2005 10:35 am, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:07 PM -0500 Phil Barnett
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i or l = [|ííiil1]
> >
> > a = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > e = [eé3]
> >
> > o = [o0]
>
> It seems like this is getting overly-complicated. Are t
I had a trick I was using in Exim that worked pretty well and cound be
recoded in perl.
First - I had a list of words spelled correctly that spammers often
deliberately misspell.
What I did was take the subject and the first 200 characters of the
body. Then I removed all the words matching the
21 matches
Mail list logo
