Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-02-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:37:48 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it gives BAYES_99: On 20.01.14 12:10, RW wrote: This is the odd bit. So, after SpamAssassin 3.4.0 re

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-02-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:32:33 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: After repeated learning as ham I get BAYES_50 at least for the latter message, but I still wonder, how exactly does spamassassin identify messages that do not contain Message-Id? On 02.02.14 13:12, RW wrote: It never uses Messag

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-02-02 Thread RW
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:32:33 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > After repeated learning as ham I get BAYES_50 at least for the latter > message, but I still wonder, how exactly does spamassassin identify > messages that do not contain Message-Id? It never uses Message-Id, it uses a hash of

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-01-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:37:48 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it gives BAYES_99: On 20.01.14 12:10, RW wrote: This is the odd bit. I think I have found it: Jan 2

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-01-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 01/20/2014 12:43 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 01/20/2014 11:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it gives BAYES_99: Unfortunately, feeding message to sa-lear

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-01-20 Thread RW
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:37:48 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > Hello, > > I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I > received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it > gives BAYES_99: This is the odd bit. > Unfortunately, feeding message to sa-lear

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-01-20 Thread Axb
On 01/20/2014 12:43 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 01/20/2014 11:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it gives BAYES_99: Unfortunately, feeding message to sa-lear

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-01-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 01/20/2014 11:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it gives BAYES_99: Unfortunately, feeding message to sa-learn explains it was not learntL OK, an update: --forge

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-01-20 Thread Axb
On 01/20/2014 11:51 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 01/20/2014 11:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it gives BAYES_99: Unfortunately, feeding message to sa-learn

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-01-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 01/20/2014 11:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it gives BAYES_99: Unfortunately, feeding message to sa-learn explains it was not learntL % sa-learn --ham < hamlea

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-01-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 01/20/2014 11:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it gives BAYES_99: Unfortunately, feeding message to sa-learn explains it was not learntL % sa-learn --ham < hamlea

Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99

2014-01-20 Thread Axb
On 01/20/2014 11:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Hello, I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it gives BAYES_99: Unfortunately, feeding message to sa-learn explains it was not learntL % sa-learn --ham