Re: no rDNS

2012-10-18 Thread Joseph Acquisto
> It's better to just score RDNS_NONE at 0. Seems I set that in the ./spamassassin/user_prefs file. I found one in /root another in /home/spamfilter. So I did them both. joe a.

Re: no rDNS

2012-10-18 Thread RW
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:22:41 -0400 Joseph Acquisto wrote: > RW 10/17/12 8:25 PM >>> > >On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:32:27 -0400 > >Joseph Acquisto wrote: > > > >> > Frustrating, as I could swear I did this with them, just some > >> > months ago. > >> > > >> > joe a. > >> > >> Just wondering,

Re: no rDNS

2012-10-18 Thread Joseph Acquisto
RW 10/17/12 8:25 PM >>> >On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:32:27 -0400 >Joseph Acquisto wrote: > >> > Frustrating, as I could swear I did this with them, just some >> > months ago. >> > >> > joe a. >> >> Just wondering, should not being a "trusted_networks" negate that >> check or modify that weigh

Re: no rDNS

2012-10-17 Thread RW
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:32:27 -0400 Joseph Acquisto wrote: > > Frustrating, as I could swear I did this with them, just some > > months ago. > > > > joe a. > > Just wondering, should not being a "trusted_networks" negate that > check or modify that weight? > > But then, I just checked and I h

Re: no rDNS

2012-10-17 Thread Joseph Acquisto
> I fear this may be due to the way I get my mail. The ISP just > informed me that I am not allowed to setup a PTR record for that > (or any) account. > > At the moment, I am at a loss. > > Frustrating, as I could swear I did this with them, just some > months ago. > > joe a. Just wond

Re: no rDNS

2012-10-16 Thread Joseph Acquisto
>>> On 10/16/2012 at 6:25 PM, Lutz Petersen wrote: >> > Wondering about this detection: >> > >> > "2.4 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with >> > no > rDNS" > > I saw this sometimes in mails delivered from external where people > have sent their mail within an in

Re: no rDNS

2012-10-16 Thread Lutz Petersen
> > Wondering about this detection: > > > > "2.4 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no > > rDNS" I saw this sometimes in mails delivered from external where people have sent their mail within an internal lan to for example the companies (internal reachable) mai

Re: no rDNS

2012-10-16 Thread RW
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:25:15 -0400 Joseph Acquisto wrote: > Wondering about this detection: > > "2.4 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host > with no rDNS" > > I see this on *all* SPAM marked email some of which are from > legitimate senders. I have set my internal boxe

Re: no rDNS

2012-10-16 Thread Ned Slider
On 16/10/12 16:25, Joseph Acquisto wrote: Wondering about this detection: "2.4 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS" Yes, I see this on *all* SPAM marked email some of which are from legitimate senders. I have set my internal boxes as trusted and i

Re: no rDNS and RDNS_NONE (Was: New free blacklist: BRBL - Barracuda Reputation Block List)

2008-09-30 Thread Joseph Brennan
--On Monday, September 29, 2008 11:52 +0100 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - there may be a mismatch (PTR exists but doesn't resolve back to IP) I don't know of an MTA that removes rDNS from the Received: header if that occurs. do you? Sendmail. The name is not shown if there

Re: no rDNS and RDNS_NONE (Was: New free blacklist: BRBL - Barracuda Reputation Block List)

2008-09-29 Thread mouss
Justin Mason wrote: mouss writes: Justin Mason wrote: >[snip] > > In fairness -- if you drop mail with no rDNS, you are dropping 3.6% of > legit email in general, going by the test results for our RDNS_NONE > rule... ;) It just came to my mind that RDNS_NONE does not mean the client does n

Re: no rDNS and RDNS_NONE (Was: New free blacklist: BRBL - Barracuda Reputation Block List)

2008-09-29 Thread Justin Mason
mouss writes: > Justin Mason wrote: > >[snip] > > > > In fairness -- if you drop mail with no rDNS, you are dropping 3.6% of > > legit email in general, going by the test results for our RDNS_NONE > > rule... ;) > > It just came to my mind that RDNS_NONE does not mean the client does not >