Thanks Theo
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 November 2004 07:35 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: need testers for a new memory patch
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 07:24:37AM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS
-Rosebank] wrote:
> What
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 07:24:37AM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]
wrote:
> What is the correct syntax for patching?
> It keeps asking which file to patch.
When you're in the main directory of the unpacked tarball, run:
patch -p0 < patchfile
Then install and enjoy. :)
--
Randomly Ge
04:45 PM
To: Justin Mason
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: need testers for a new memory patch
> So, I have a new patch that should greatly improve memory usage if you
> have a low memory situation (where "low" == "< 100MB of free RAM",
> typically
> So, I have a new patch that should greatly improve memory usage
> if you have a low memory situation (where "low" == "< 100MB of
> free RAM", typically ;)
>
> It should apply cleanly to 3.0.0. I'd be very interested in
> feedback from people trying it... here it is:
>
> http://bugzilla.spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thanks Andy -- sounds like very good results there.
anyone else tried it yet?
- --j.
Andy Jezierski writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/19/2004 08:09:26 PM:
>
> > So, I have a new patch that should greatly improve memory usage
> > if you have a
Michael Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 11/23/2004 10:07:45 AM:
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:34:42AM -0600, Andy Jezierski wrote:
> > I'm running on a FreeBSD 5.2.1 system with 192MB of ram
>
>
[snip]
>
> I'm not trying to be rude. But if I were stuck with the same
crappy
> server hard
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:34:42AM -0600, Andy Jezierski wrote:
> I'm running on a FreeBSD 5.2.1 system with 192MB of ram
Please ignore this if this box is an old personal machine or a test box,
or this is some donated box for a charity organization or something
similar.
I've always considered
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/19/2004 08:09:26 PM:
> So, I have a new patch that should greatly improve memory usage
> if you have a low memory situation (where "low" == "<
100MB of
> free RAM", typically ;)
>
> It should apply cleanly to 3.0.0. I'd be very interested in
> feedback from people
