Re: message sneaking past SOLVED

2006-02-07 Thread Julian Underwood
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 22:51 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > jdow wrote: > > From: "Julian Underwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To answer Evan and Matt's question, I use MIMEDefang to send spams to > >> the spam box. Again, most spam is tagged correctly and moved > >> accordingly. > >> > >>> Or a

Re: message sneaking past

2006-02-07 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
jdow wrote: From: "Julian Underwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To answer Evan and Matt's question, I use MIMEDefang to send spams to the spam box. Again, most spam is tagged correctly and moved accordingly. Or are you saying that when one of these puppies gets through and you go back later and test

Re: message sneaking past

2006-02-07 Thread jdow
From: "Julian Underwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hey guys, thanks for your replies, it's appreciated. On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 10:44 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote: > I cna't seem to connect to your site, so I'll just assume that is a standard vertical drug spam. Yep. I've been getting weird Horizon

Re: message sneaking past

2006-02-07 Thread jdow
From: "Julian Underwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://168.100.199.67/message.txt Sorry if this is the third time I've posted this, I've been having problems posting. Anyhow, I've been receiving the above type of emails (vertical drug advertisements) and they appear to receive a very high score.

Re: message sneaking past

2006-02-07 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Julian Underwood wrote: Here's another example message: http://168.100.199.67/message2.txt This message contains both SURBL hits, a correct score total, and appropriate mark up. I think the problem is SURBL points aren't being tallied or even calculated when a spam first comes in, theref

Re: message sneaking past

2006-02-07 Thread Julian Underwood
Hey guys, thanks for your replies, it's appreciated. On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 10:44 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote: > > > > I cna't seem to connect to your site, so I'll just assume that is a standard > vertical drug spam. > Yep. I've been getting weird Horizontal spams too which are slipping by. To

Re: message sneaking past

2006-02-07 Thread Loren Wilton
> http://168.100.199.67/message.txt I cna't seem to connect to your site, so I'll just assume that is a standard vertical drug spam. > they appear to receive a very high > score. However they always seem to get past spamassassin--other spams > get tagged and redirected to our spam box fine. Now

Re: message sneaking past

2006-02-07 Thread Matt Kettler
Julian Underwood wrote: > http://168.100.199.67/message.txt > > Sorry if this is the third time I've posted this, I've been having > problems posting. Anyhow, I've been receiving the above type of emails > (vertical drug advertisements) and they appear to receive a very high > score. However they

Re: message sneaking past

2006-02-07 Thread Evan Platt
At 07:13 AM 2/7/2006, you wrote: http://168.100.199.67/message.txt Sorry if this is the third time I've posted this, I've been having problems posting. Anyhow, I've been receiving the above type of emails (vertical drug advertisements) and they appear to receive a very high score. However they