On 2005-02-02 10:59:43 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have seen it done both ways in examples.
Both. Is it so difficult to read procmailrc(5)?
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany
V
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Which of these is correct in my procmailrc if I use spamc?
>
>
>
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> * < 256000
> | spamc
>
>
> or
>
>
> :0fw: spamc.lock
> * < 256000
> | spamc
Both.
{^_^}
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Which of these is correct in my procmailrc if I use spamc?
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> or
> :0fw: spamc.lock
>
> I have seen it done both ways in examples.
Yeah, it doesn't matter as long as you're consistent.
--
Randomly Gene
