I'd suggest addign soemthing like:
After running sa-update for the first time old rules which are provided
through one of sa-update's channels should be removed from
/etc/mail/spamassassin (or whichever is our local rules directory) because
the rules in this directory will take precedence over
David Goldsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/02/2007 20:10:46:
> Bram Mertens wrote:
[...]
> > Lately however the number of SPAM messages getting through is
increasing
> > rapidly so I could use some help.
[...]
> SA 3.1.x will look for rules in /usr/share/spamassassin,
> /var/lib/spamassassin
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: how to start using sa-update
On 2/25/2007 5:31 PM, John Fleming wrote:
-
On 2/25/2007 5:31 PM, John Fleming wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: how to start using sa-update
On 2/25/2007 5:13 PM, John Fleming wrote:
The sa-update channe
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: how to start using sa-update
On 2/25/2007 5:13 PM, John Fleming wrote:
The sa-update channels allow you to check for new rulesets more o
On 2/25/2007 5:13 PM, John Fleming wrote:
The sa-update channels allow you to check for new rulesets more often
than once a day, so you can get newly released rulesets a little
faster. Of course the SARE rules aren't really updated that often so
this may not be a big advantage for you.
So th
The sa-update channels allow you to check for new rulesets more often than
once a day, so you can get newly released rulesets a little faster. Of
course the SARE rules aren't really updated that often so this may not be
a big advantage for you.
So the signature is good but it's not trusted? O
On 2/25/2007 3:57 PM, Brian Wilson wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 3:24 PM, John Fleming wrote:
Thanks for the Q&A! Now, is there any functional difference between
using sa-update in this way and using RDJ to get the SARE rules?
(I'm using RDJ right now, so what would I gain by changing to
On Feb 25, 2007, at 3:24 PM, John Fleming wrote:
- Original Message - From: "David Goldsmith"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bram Mertens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: how to start using sa-update
-BE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Fleming wrote:
> Thanks for the Q&A! Now, is there any functional difference between
> using sa-update in this way and using RDJ to get the SARE rules? (I'm
> using RDJ right now, so what would I gain by changing to sa-update with
> a SARE chan
- Original Message -
From: "David Goldsmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bram Mertens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: how to start using sa-update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bram Mertens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bram Mertens wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I unsubscribed from this list decembre 2004 since SA was working fine for
> me and I couldn't keep up with the volume on this list.
>
> Lately however the number of SPAM messages getting through is increasing
> rapidly
12 matches
Mail list logo
