hat means my message types
don't change much. ;-)
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "sinnerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: help with training bayesian filter
I'm running spamd as:
spamd -
sinnerman wrote:
> I'm running spamd as:
>
> spamd -d -l -u nobody --siteconfigpath=
>
Is there a particular reason why you're using the --siteconfigpath?
The reason I ask is nearly everyone I've seen use this option, mis-uses
it. The only time you should want to use this option is if you need
sinnerman wrote:
> I think I've solved the issues:
>
> * I've stoped using spamc/spamd, and now just use spamassassin (running as
> my logged in user, just like sa-learn). I think that has solved the issue of
> which bayesian database is being used.
>
Well, your spamd startup was forcing everyth
I think I've solved the issues:
* I've stoped using spamc/spamd, and now just use spamassassin (running as
my logged in user, just like sa-learn). I think that has solved the issue of
which bayesian database is being used.
* I had to explicitly load the plugin in my config file (I though it was
I'm running spamd as:
spamd -d -l -u nobody --siteconfigpath=
My config file is:
required_hits 4
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 8
bayes_min_ham_num 100
score BAYES_99 5
I don't have bayes_auto_learn set explicitly, but the docs indicate that
enabled
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:27:52PM -0700, sinnerman wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I currently have SpamAssaassin setup on my FreeBSD machine and have trained
> it with spam and ham messages (greater than the min thresholds of 200/200).
> However, I'm not sure it's setup correctly, nor do I see any obvio
