Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread David Gibbs
mouss wrote: uri GOOGLE_SEARCH_BTNIm{gooo?gle\..*/search.*btnI=} Loose the last equals sign, I've seen similar samples come through without it. david

Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread John D. Hardin
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, JP Kelly wrote: > > JP Kelly wrote: > > >> I am not able to write my own rules or regex. Does that mean "I don't know how to write regular expressions", or "my SA install doesn't permit me to add rules"? If the former, then the rules I and others have posted over the past w

Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread mouss
JP Kelly wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: She'll Beg for More.. Date: January 21, 2008 10:34:15 AM PST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssas

Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread JP Kelly
On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:26 AM, mouss wrote: JP Kelly wrote: Enough is enough! SA has been working so well for me all these years I guess I am spoiled. I woke up this morning and had 5 Google spams and one legit email and I've had it. I noticed a somewhat lengthy discussion on the subject h

Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread mouss
JP Kelly wrote: Enough is enough! SA has been working so well for me all these years I guess I am spoiled. I woke up this morning and had 5 Google spams and one legit email and I've had it. I noticed a somewhat lengthy discussion on the subject here. I am not able to write my own rules or rege