Re: filtering by time

2006-09-14 Thread Toni Casueps
It's true that mail can be delayed and all that, but anyway, legitimate email usuallly has less points than spam and I think they will not go past 5 points. I gave that rule 1.5 points just for that spams that have 4 or 4.5 points I do receive messages from people overseas, and I'm subscribe

Re: filtering by time

2006-09-14 Thread Matthias Haegele
John Andersen schrieb: On Thursday 14 September 2006 00:21, Toni Casueps wrote: It corresponds to the received header that my MTA adds, so it has the local time when the message arrives. It matches messages that arrive from 00:00:00 to 06:59:59 (i gave it a score of 1.5). So you have no friend

Re: filtering by time

2006-09-14 Thread John Andersen
On Thursday 14 September 2006 00:21, Toni Casueps wrote: > It corresponds to the received header that my MTA adds, so it has the local > time when the message arrives. It matches messages that arrive from > 00:00:00 to 06:59:59 (i gave it a score of 1.5). So you have no friends on the opposite sid

Re: filtering by time

2006-09-14 Thread Toni Casueps
Thanks. I searched the archives and found a link to a site that now redirects to SARE, but I couldn't find a rule for this there. So I finally wrote a rule that seems to work: header RECEIVED_AT_NIGHTReceived =~ /id [^;]+; ..., \d?\d ... \d\d\d\d 0[0-6]:\d\d:\d\d/ This matches hea

Re: filtering by time

2006-09-12 Thread Loren Wilton
points if the message arrives between, say, 1:00 and 6:00 (I should set it from 21:00 to 8:00 since this is an office and I don't think someone is going to send anything work-related at this time, but just to be careful... ). Do you know how can this be done? Do you think it could give too many