Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 08.08.16 06:39, robertboyl wrote: I added util_rb_3tld nibo.com.br then sent msg with this in body -: http://conteudo.nibo.com.br can you check spamassassin -D over the message? this is listed in the DNSBL which has a rule to check for it via uridnsbl plugin, but no hit. Also tried to ad

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-08 Thread robertboyl
Thanks a lot for your help. It didnt work. I added util_rb_3tld nibo.com.br then sent msg with this in body -: http://conteudo.nibo.com.br this is listed in the DNSBL which has a rule to check for it via uridnsbl plugin, but no hit. Also tried to add tld and 2tld... but no luck. Ill just use

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-05 Thread Axb
On 08/05/2016 08:46 PM, Kevin Golding wrote: On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 19:17:16 +0100, robertboyl wrote: .com.br afaik is TLD nibo.com.br is a 2tld conteudo.nibo.com.br a 3tld Your counting is off: .br is a top level domain - ref: http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db .com.br is a 2nd level domain

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-05 Thread Kevin Golding
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 19:17:16 +0100, robertboyl wrote: .com.br afaik is TLD nibo.com.br is a 2tld conteudo.nibo.com.br a 3tld Your counting is off: .br is a top level domain - ref: http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db .com.br is a 2nd level domain .nibo.com.br is a 3rd level domain Adding n

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-05 Thread robertboyl
Hi Matheus Thanks a lot for your help! What I dont understand is why I have to specify domains, subdomains... Cant I just query the DNSBL and if it has a URI that hits, then consider it? Or else, it might just be easier to create a rule rawbody/body with certain spamvertised URLs to catch, when w

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 04.08.16 10:48, robertboyl wrote: Can you detail when you say to check util_rb_2tld and util_rb_3tld directives? check their documentation to see what are they doing I have to manually add all 2tld manually in this file...? no. most of them are already configured in SA rules (you do kee

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-04 Thread robertboyl
Hi, guys Thanks a lot for replies!! First of all, sorry for long mail! Let me try to detail a bit, as this has been confusing for us to understand. Can you detail when you say to check util_rb_2tld and util_rb_3tld directives? I have to manually add all 2tld manually in this file...? Sorry we h

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.08.2016 um 01:43 schrieb Benny Pedersen: On 2016-08-02 17:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: you can not, but you could check util_rb_2tld and util_rb_3tld directives to see if it fits your needs use them will disable spam test on this tld aswell just look at /var/lib/spamassassin/

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2016-08-02 17:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: you can not, but you could check util_rb_2tld and util_rb_3tld directives to see if it fits your needs use them will disable spam test on this tld aswell

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2016-08-02 16:36, Robert Boyl wrote: How can I make it work with subdomains also? why would you like this to happen ?

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-02 Thread Axb
On 08/02/2016 04:36 PM, Robert Boyl wrote: Hi, everyone We are trying to query subdomains of a DNSBL in body of message, but learned that the default plugin we use, used by URIBL, caps off subdomains. This is the rule we based ourselves on... it works fine, except for subdomains... it considers

Re: eval:check_uridnsbl to check subdomains

2016-08-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 02.08.16 11:36, Robert Boyl wrote: We are trying to query subdomains of a DNSBL in body of message, but learned that the default plugin we use, used by URIBL, caps off subdomains. This is the rule we based ourselves on... it works fine, except for subdomains... it considers the domain part...