Tom Caudron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was just trying to save space. When I said "get hosed" I meant it
> behaved as I described in the first message in the thread.
> Specifically, it returns the "0/0" error result whenever it is given a
> message that would be marked as spam (as evidenced
Daniel said, "One minor note: "spamasassin" does not use spamd. To use
spamd, you need to run "spamc"."
Right. Just being thorough. The point is that when I call spamasassin
directly (rather than via spamc/spamd) I get a valid return result.
Daniel said, ""get hosed"? I suggest you work on th
Tom Caudron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel said, "'more' is definitively the wrong way to run this as it
> adds paging lines, etc. It's also not needed. Just run: "spamc <
> message"
>
> I get the same results.
Well, I'd have guessed that you would have the same results as it just
adds ga
Daniel said, "spamd is not running, you've installed it wrong, or
something else"
I installed it with apt-get (using synaptic in Fedora Core 2), though
it's possible that the install is bad. I get the same results on a
separate FC1 box as well, though.
Daniel said, "'more' is definitively the wro
Tom Caudron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've installed SpamAssassin version 2.64 via Synaptic on Fedora Core 2.
> I want to use it to filter spam in Evolution. In Evolution, I created a
> filter that pipes the message to a shell command on retrieval (pipes to
> "spamc -c").
>
> I get no hits
