> On Monday 21 January 2008 12:29, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> > > I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to
> > > disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl
> > > and maybe some other blackhole
On Monday 21 January 2008 12:29, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> > I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to
> > disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl
> > and maybe some other blackhole lists.
>
On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to
> disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl
> and maybe some other blackhole lists.
why?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantoma
On Friday 18 January 2008 13:46, you wrote:
> Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to
> > disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl
> > and maybe some other blackhole lists.
> > I guess I can co
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to disable
all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl and maybe
some other blackhole lists.
I guess I can comment out the corresponding header lines in the files
20_dnsbl_t
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to disable
all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl and maybe
some other blackhole lists.
I guess I can comment out the corresponding header lines in the files
20_dnsbl_t
