Re: blacklist-uri.cf

2006-12-12 Thread Martin Hepworth
Jeff Chan wrote: On Sunday, December 10, 2006, 3:50:33 AM, Arthur CPTeam wrote: Howdy, As Matt says, SURBLs are included in the default configuration for SA since 3.0. Be sure to have a recent Net::DNS installed and to enable network tests with the appropriate flags: http://www.surbl.org/

Re: blacklist-uri.cf

2006-12-12 Thread Jeff Chan
On Sunday, December 10, 2006, 3:50:33 AM, Arthur CPTeam wrote: > Howdy, >> As Matt says, SURBLs are included in the default configuration >> for SA since 3.0. Be sure to have a recent Net::DNS installed >> and to enable network tests with the appropriate flags: >> >> http://www.surbl.org/faq.h

Re: blacklist-uri.cf

2006-12-09 Thread LuKreme
On 8-Dec-2006, at 19:25, Matt Kettler wrote: The 25_uribl.cf that comes with, and is automatically installed with, SpamAssassin 3.0.0 and higher has all the SURBL lists in it. Ah, there we go. It's been so long since I actually DID anything with SA's config I completely forgot about /usr/loc

Re: blacklist-uri.cf

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Kettler
LuKreme wrote: > On 8-Dec-2006, at 16:11, Matt Kettler wrote: >> It uses an *ABSURD* amount of memory, and is 100% redundant with the WS >> list on surbl.org. > > The WS list? I don't think I'm setup for SURBL. I'm running RDJ with SURBL is part of the standard SA ruleset, nothing to do with RDJ..

Re: blacklist-uri.cf

2006-12-08 Thread LuKreme
On 8-Dec-2006, at 16:11, Matt Kettler wrote: It uses an *ABSURD* amount of memory, and is 100% redundant with the WS list on surbl.org. The WS list? I don't think I'm setup for SURBL. I'm running RDJ with TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE EVILNUMBERS RANDOMVAL BOGUSVIRUS SARE_ADULT SARE_FRAUD SARE

Re: blacklist-uri.cf

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Kettler
LuKreme wrote: > > Is there something about > > blacklist-uri.cf > > That I should know? It uses an *ABSURD* amount of memory, and is 100% redundant with the WS list on surbl.org. Don't use it unless BOTH of the following are true: 1) the idea of increasing your mailserver memory load by

RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem

2005-12-01 Thread John Narron
face of injury?" (660) 886 4045 | - Queensryche > -Original Message- > From: Casey King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem

RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem

2005-12-01 Thread Casey King
bit jaded. -Original Message- From: John Narron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:29 AM To: 'Casey King'; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem Dunno, I don't maintain it, just providing a workaround until it can

RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem

2005-12-01 Thread John Narron
.net | In the face of injury?" (660) 886 4045 | - Queensryche > -Original Message- > From: Casey King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: Blackl

RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem

2005-12-01 Thread Casey King
I will definitely do this, but what happens when the update comes in tomorrow...will this be fixed by then? -Original Message- From: John Narron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:15 AM To: 'Casey King'; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE:

RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem

2005-12-01 Thread John Narron
In sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf, edit line 16: uri WLS_URI_OPT_0 m/\b//document-records.com\b/i to look like: uri WLS_URI_OPT_0 m/\b\/document-records.com\b/i If you have any sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf. files, delete those and re-run RDJ John Narron| "Sacrifice, they