Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-26 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
I suggest to spend some time reading the relevant documentation. In particular the M::SA::Conf and AutoLearnThreshold docs. http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc/ On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 22:12 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > So, now I am really confused. I think I did everything right in > > user_

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-25 Thread RW
On Sun, 25 May 2014 08:59:28 -0700 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On Sun, 25 May 2014 16:40:44 +0200 > Axb wrote: > > Axb> URIBL rules are not set to use 'userconf' (user configuration) > Axb> so entries in user_prefs shouldn't affect the results > > Axb> if anything it should go in a system wide rule

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-25 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Sun, 25 May 2014 20:06:22 +0200 Axb wrote: Axb> Yes, when it reached certain conditions and a score above 15.0 Axb> you can tune that score via local.cf entries: Axb> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam Please see the prefs in my post upthread - I have already

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-25 Thread Axb
On 05/25/2014 05:59 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: On Sun, 25 May 2014 16:40:44 +0200 Axb wrote: Axb> URIBL rules are not set to use 'userconf' (user configuration) Axb> so entries in user_prefs shouldn't affect the results Axb> if anything it should go in a system wide rule (ie: local.cf) (not Axb>

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-25 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Sun, 25 May 2014 16:40:44 +0200 Axb wrote: Axb> URIBL rules are not set to use 'userconf' (user configuration) Axb> so entries in user_prefs shouldn't affect the results Axb> if anything it should go in a system wide rule (ie: local.cf) (not Axb> user_prefs) Axb> your: tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-25 Thread Axb
On 05/25/2014 07:12 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_force tflags URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn_force tflags URIBL_BLACK autolearn_force tflags INVALID_DATE autolearn_force URIBL rules are not set to use 'userconf' (user configuration) so entries in user_prefs shouldn't affe

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-25 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 5/25/2014 1:12 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: So, now I am really confused. I think I did everything right in user_prefs: bayes_auto_learn1 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -2.00 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 6.00 bayes_auto_learn_on_error 0 [snip] tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_for

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-25 Thread RW
On Sat, 24 May 2014 22:12:10 -0700 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > So, now I am really confused. I think I did everything right in > > user_prefs: > > ... > > Nonetheless: > > > > X-Spam-Score: 6.9 > > X-Spam-Tests: > > BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, > > HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MI

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-24 Thread Ian Zimmerman
> So, now I am really confused. I think I did everything right in > user_prefs: > > bayes_auto_learn 1 > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -2.00 > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 6.00 > bayes_auto_learn_on_error 0 > > [snip] > > tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_force > tflags URIBL_JP_SURB

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-24 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Thu, 22 May 2014 15:54:42 +0100 RW wrote: Ian> But in fact this is a per-test setting, a subcategory of tflags. Ian> Do I have to specify it separately for every test? Why? RW> The point is to set it for a small number of rules that are RW> sufficiently strong as to guarantee there will be n

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-22 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Thu, 22 May 2014 15:54:42 +0100 RW wrote: Ian> I don't understand this setting, and reading the documentation Ian> doesn't help. Ian> It seems it should make Bayes learn spam whenever the total score Ian> surpasses the value of bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam, and not Ian> require 3 points fr

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-22 Thread RW
On Wed, 21 May 2014 21:34:23 -0700 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I don't understand this setting, and reading the documentation doesn't > help. > > It seems it sould make bayes learn spam whenever the total score > surpasses the value of bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam, and not > require 3 points from h