RE: autolearn=failed ---- after upgrade to 3.11

2006-03-13 Thread Steven Manross
> > It seems that since upgrading to 3.11 last night, the > > autolearn=yes|no|failed always shows up as failed (on all messages). > > > > Did I miss something? > > Generally "Failed" means that SA somehow can't access the > bayes database to write to it. > > Have you tried sa-learn --sync an

RE: autolearn=failed ---- after upgrade to 3.11

2006-03-13 Thread Steven Manross
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:35 PM > To: Steven Manross > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: autolearn=failed ---- after upgrade to 3.11 > > Steven Manross wrote: > > &g

Re: autolearn=failed ---- after upgrade to 3.11

2006-03-13 Thread Matt Kettler
Steven Manross wrote: > It looks like the autolearn is working now. > > Does anyone have any ideas on the "misplaced" headers? Or is that a new > de facto standard? You mean this: > As well, the headers added by SA (and me [through SA] for MsgID) are now > showing at the top of the headers from

Re: autolearn=failed ---- after upgrade to 3.11

2006-03-13 Thread Matt Kettler
Steven Manross wrote: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 > tests=AWL=0.023,BAYES_00=-2.599 > autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 > > It seems that since upgrading to 3.11 last night, the > autolearn=yes|no|failed always shows up as failed (on all messages). > > Did I miss something? Gen

RE: autolearn=failed ---- after upgrade to 3.11

2006-03-13 Thread Steven Manross
> -Original Message- > From: Steven Manross > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 12:46 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: autolearn=failed after upgrade to 3.11 > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 > tests=AWL=0.023,BAYES_00=-2.599 > autolearn=failed version=3.1.1