On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 02:03 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 09:23 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > can that by any chance fix problem with Date: in mail received by SSL ?
> > That one behaves similarly...
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassas
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 09:23 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 09.06.14 05:49, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Found the culprit after some digging. Bug 6915 [1], revision 1453407. As
> > a band-aid, the following trivial one-line patch fixes it. Can easily be
> > applied manually.
>
> can t
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 05:49 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Found the culprit after some digging. Bug 6915 [1], revision 1453407. As
> a band-aid, the following trivial one-line patch fixes it. Can easily be
> applied manually.
>
> Since it is kind of way past "getting late" here, and there ma
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 05:49 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 20:56 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > In my etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I have the above line. I just
>
> For completeness: That add_header option does work, although there are
> actually exactly 3 arguments.
>
> a
On 09.06.14 05:49, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Found the culprit after some digging. Bug 6915 [1], revision 1453407. As
a band-aid, the following trivial one-line patch fixes it. Can easily be
applied manually.
can that by any chance fix problem with Date: in mail received by SSL ?
That one beha
On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 20:56 -0500, Chris wrote:
> In my etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I have the above line. I just
For completeness: That add_header option does work, although there are
actually exactly 3 arguments.
add_header { spam | ham | all } header_name string
Just like stock configura
I am not using amavis and do not want to use it.
On 2014-01-10 04:20, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Mark Chaney skrev den 2014-01-10 06:55:
I know that information is already included in the X-Spam-Status, but
I really need them to be separate available on with their own line as
well. I guess its not
Mark Chaney skrev den 2014-01-10 06:55:
I know that information is already included in the X-Spam-Status, but
I really need them to be separate available on with their own line as
well. I guess its not possible to specify multiple add_header entries?
http://blog.dmitryleskov.com/small-hacks/fo
Thanks, that helps a bit:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=5.0 tests=[AWL=-0.040,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SO_FROM_HJPC=0.65, SO_HELO_LDOM=0.65,
SO_LOCAL_FROM=-0.1, SO_NOT_FROM_RP=2.5, SPF_FAIL=0.919] autolearn=no
X-Spam-Level:
But I am still missing these two lines:
X-
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 07:29 -0600, Mark Chaney wrote:
> I am using spamassassin standalone and I am trying to figure out how to
> duplicate this format that I would normally get from my servers that
> user amavis or mailscanner. How can I get a format like so? Ive read the
> manual, but havent r
Thanks everyone for the ideas, two things though:
1) I am not doing any type of custom filter on the relay server that SA
is running on, I was just more hoping for that particular format as I
think it has the best information without a mess. I honestly dont know
the first thing about creating
Bowie Bailey skrev den 2014-01-07 15:55:
If you want this report on all messages, you can add the following
line to your local.cf or user_prefs file:
add_header all Report _REPORT_
or better maybe:
add_header spam SpamReport _REPORT_
add_header ham HamReport _REPORT_
this is more easy to gre
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 07:29 -0600, Mark Chaney wrote:
> I am using spamassassin standalone and I am trying to figure out how to
> duplicate this format that I would normally get from my servers that
> user amavis or mailscanner. How can I get a format like so? Ive read the
> manual, but havent r
On 1/7/2014 8:29 AM, Mark Chaney wrote:
I am using spamassassin standalone and I am trying to figure out how to
duplicate this format that I would normally get from my servers that
user amavis or mailscanner. How can I get a format like so? Ive read the
manual, but havent really figured it out. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> I add this lines in user_prefs:
>>>
>>> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
>>> add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
>>> add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
>>> add_header all Tests _TESTS_
>>> add_hea
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> I add this lines in user_prefs:
>>
>> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
>> add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
>> add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
>> add_header all Tests _TESTS_
>> add_header all Autolearn _AUTOLEARN_ \n Version=_V
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I add this lines in user_prefs:
>
> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
> add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
> add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
> add_header all Tests _TESTS_
> add_header all Autolearn _AUTOLEARN_ \n Version=_VERSION_
> a
hi Matthias --
could you open this as a bug in bugzilla? It should definitely be
part of the Bayes tokens, and if it's not, that's a bug.
--j.
Matthias Leisi writes:
> [This question may be more appropriate for the dev-list, please move as
> required]
>
> Hi list,
>
> When I originally wrote
On Sunday 04 March 2007 11:54 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Anyway, reading the debug output... It appears that your installation is
> very messed up. To start, get rid of the *.cf files in
> /etc/mail/spamassassin which reference anything from sa-update. According
> to the output you're loading
Chris wrote:
On Sunday 04 March 2007 11:54 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Anyway, reading the debug output... It appears that your installation is
very messed up. To start, get rid of the *.cf files in
/etc/mail/spamassassin which reference anything from sa-update. According
to the output you'r
On Sunday 04 March 2007 11:54 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:56:19PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> > The entire debug output is here:
> > http://mediasafe.embarq.com/chris1948/Hosted/chrisdebug-1.txt.tar.bz2
>
> Hrm. Well, a few thoughts, including -- why create a tar file for a s
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:56:19PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> The entire debug output is here:
> http://mediasafe.embarq.com/chris1948/Hosted/chrisdebug-1.txt.tar.bz2
Hrm. Well, a few thoughts, including -- why create a tar file for a single
file? Just compress the text file. ;)
Anyway, reading the
On Sunday 04 March 2007 8:56 pm, John Andersen wrote:
> > Yes John, for the record, I just now made a test without the parens:
> >
> > add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
> > tests=_TESTSSCORES_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_
>
> Whelp, that's not it then. Here's
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Chris wrote:
> On Sunday 04 March 2007 4:16 pm, John Andersen wrote:
> > So for the record, have you or have you not tried
> > tests=_TESTSSCORES_ (without the parens)??
>
> Yes John, for the record, I just now made a test without the parens:
>
> add_header all Status _
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
> John Andersen wrote:
> > Mine did not work till I removed the parens and added the underscore.
>
> And added the underscore? You always need the trailing underscore. Even
> with the (,)
Slip of the tongue. I removed the parens, period.
I did it bec
On Sunday 04 March 2007 4:16 pm, John Andersen wrote:
>
> So for the record, have you or have you not tried
> tests=_TESTSSCORES_ (without the parens)??
Yes John, for the record, I just now made a test without the parens:
add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
tests=_T
John Andersen wrote:
>
>
> Mine did not work till I removed the parens and added the underscore.
>
And added the underscore? You always need the trailing underscore. Even
with the (,)
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
> John Andersen wrote:
> > So for the record, have you or have you not tried
> > tests=_TESTSSCORES_ (without the parens)??
>
> I guess since there's no other good theories, this might be worth a shot.
>
> That said, I'd be absolutely floored if this
John Andersen wrote:
>
>
> So for the record, have you or have you not tried
> tests=_TESTSSCORES_ (without the parens)??
>
I guess since there's no other good theories, this might be worth a shot.
That said, I'd be absolutely floored if this fixed the problem, given
that _TESTSSCORES_ is
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Chris wrote:
The above line in my local.cf on version 3.1.7 produced
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=48.6 required=5.0tests=AWL=1.313,BAYES_99=5,
BOTNET=5,DCC_CHECK=2.17,DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.765,FM_MULTI_ODD2=1.1,
Thi
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Chris wrote:
> On Saturday 03 March 2007 11:26 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:11:46PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> > > > That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error
> > > > elsewhere causing that line to not get used. Have you run
> >
On Saturday 03 March 2007 11:26 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:11:46PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> > > That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
> > > causing that line to not get used. Have you run "spamassassin --lint"
> > > ?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTE
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:19:49PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
> Cuz it doesn't work?
We could go back and forth all night about this, but I'm going to stop
with this message. If you cut/paste that line into a config file and
run a message through a functional 3.1.8, as I have done, you will find
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:11:46PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> > That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
> > causing that line to not get used. Have you run "spamassassin --lint" ?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ spamassassin --lint
> No errors are shown
Hrm. Is that config
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Why is that not ok?
Cuz it doesn't work?
--
_
John Andersen
pgphFmMfiALje.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:10:33PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
> > > What config line? Chris didn't list a config line.
> >
> > The subject of this thread is a config line.
>
> Oh, that one.
> No, its not fine.
> it should be tests=_TESTSSCORES_
Why is that not ok? a) it works fine in a cf f
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Chris wrote:
> On Saturday 03 March 2007 10:51 pm, John Andersen wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> > > > Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the
> > > > o
On Saturday 03 March 2007 10:51 pm, John Andersen wrote:
> On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> > > Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the
> > > output?
> >
> > That config line is fine. My guess
On Saturday 03 March 2007 10:40 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> > Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the
> > output?
>
> That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
> causing that line to
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:51:03PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
> > > That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
> > > causing that line to not get used. Have you run "spamassassin --lint"
> > > ?
> >
> > What config l
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:51:03PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
> > That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
> > causing that line to not get used. Have you run "spamassassin --lint" ?
>
> What config line? Chris didn't list a config line.
The subject of this threa
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> > Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the
> > output?
>
> That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
> causing that line to not get u
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the output?
That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
causing that line to not get used. Have you run "spamassassin --lint" ?
--
Randomly Select
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Chris wrote:
> The above line in my local.cf on version 3.1.7 produced
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=48.6 required=5.0tests=AWL=1.313,BAYES_99=5,
> BOTNET=5,DCC_CHECK=2.17,DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.765,FM_MULTI_ODD2=1.1,
>
>
> This has quit working for 3.1.8 and
ing it in the header from one of the servers.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:00 AM
To: Geoff Manning; Users (E-mail)
Subject: Re: add_header
At 08:48 AM 4/28/2005, Geoff Manning wrote:
>The local.cf file is the s
At 08:48 AM 4/28/2005, Geoff Manning wrote:
The local.cf file is the same on both.
There are no user_prefs files getting in the way that are altering the
behavior of the add_header (that I can see).
Where else should I look?
How is spamassassin called? Is it the same on both, or does the one that's
Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
FYI, to anyone who runs into the same problem, there is a patched
version of qmail-scanner.pl that allow you to include SA-created
headers (plus other cool options not in the original):
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/j.toribio/qmail-scanner/READMEpatched.html
...or you could
FYI, to anyone who runs into the same problem, there is a patched
version of qmail-scanner.pl that allow you to include SA-created headers
(plus other cool options not in the original):
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/j.toribio/qmail-scanner/READMEpatched.html
-Roger
on 18.01.2005 12:30 Roger WJ Alterskjær said the following:
on 17.01.2005 19:47 Andy Jezierski said the following:
[snip]
I don't use qmail-scanner, but do
you
have to re-start
it for new config changes to take effect? Does qmail-scanner have it's
own config file that overrides SA
on 17.01.2005 19:47 Andy Jezierski said the following:
[snip]
I don't use qmail-scanner, but do you
have to re-start
it for new config changes to take effect? Does qmail-scanner have it's
own config file that overrides SA like amavisd-new?
qmail-scanner.pl is called when receiving and email.
Roger WJ Alterskjær <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/17/2005 11:38:38 AM:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to get the additional info on what tests were
'plinged' when
> > > run through SA. With 2.64 I was able to get these reports
when a
> > message
> > > was marked as spam.(the old X-Spam-Report which is
Andy Jezierski wrote:
Roger WJ Alterskjær <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/17/2005
10:27:20 AM:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
> >
> >> I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to
> >> get the add_header option working. Before I
Roger WJ Alterskjær <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/17/2005 10:27:20 AM:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
> >
> >> I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't
seem to
> >> get the add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA
3.0.
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to
get the add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA 3.0.2,
spamd -d -c -m5 -u qscand, spamc called by qmail-scanner 1.24.
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/loca
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to
get the add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA 3.0.2,
spamd -d -c -m5 -u qscand, spamc called by qmail-scanner 1.24.
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/loca
At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to get the
add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA 3.0.2, spamd -d -c -m5
-u qscand, spamc called by qmail-scanner 1.24.
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I've got:
add_h
56 matches
Mail list logo
