On Fri, March 30, 2007 01:15, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, maillist wrote:
>> John D. Hardin wrote:
>> > Can anyone recommend a non-abusive way to validate email addresses?
>> Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and ask them?
> Ba-dump-bump!
> Can anyone recommend a non-abusive *au
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, John D. Hardin wrote:
Can anyone recommend a non-abusive *automated* way to validate email
addresses?
Maybe you should ask the spammers. :)
Seriously, though, there are basically two options: VRFY (which many
servers have disabled for just this reason); and starting a fak
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, maillist wrote:
> John D. Hardin wrote:
> > Can anyone recommend a non-abusive way to validate email addresses?
>
> Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and ask them?
Ba-dump-bump!
Can anyone recommend a non-abusive *automated* way to validate email
addresses?
--
John Har
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
Are you using (SMTP) Sender Address Verifications?
(Or Challenge Response?)
If you are, you *will* be blacklisted by some systems and DNSBLs.
Probably not only apews (whoever they are).
You might see that as filtering, but to the systems (including both
spam traps a
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
Are you using (SMTP) Sender Address Verifications?
You might see that as filtering, but to the systems (including
both spam traps and SMTP servers) you connect to in order to
verify falsified senders your system looks and acts
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
> Are you using (SMTP) Sender Address Verifications?
>
> You might see that as filtering, but to the systems (including
> both spam traps and SMTP servers) you connect to in order to
> verify falsified senders your system looks and acts like a spammer
>
Marc Perkel wrote:
Here's what they have on the /24 block that I'm part of.
Systems running abusive Spamdefense on other systems expense. (CR, SAV
or similar crap)
> for running abusive and selfish SAV from there.
Are you using (SMTP) Sender Address Verifications?
(Or Challenge Response?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hmm
I got this from Whois.sc
Domain ID:D135922574-LROR
Domain Name:APEWS.ORG
Created On:27-Dec-2006 19:25:43 UTC
Last Updated On:26-Feb-2007 03:47:58 UTC
Expiration Date:27-Dec-2007 19:25:43 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:PSI-USA, Inc. dba Domain Robot (R6
Marc Perkel wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
The don't seem to have any contact info. Anyone know anything about
them?
Whoops - typo. - I mean apews.org
Dunno. Tar-pit?
Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> Marc Perkel wrote:
>> The don't seem to have any contact info. Anyone know anything about
>> them?
>>
>
> Whoops - typo. - I mean apews.org
>
They seem to be an attempt to clone spews. 99.99% of the website was
directly copied from spews.org
>From the website at http://ww
Marc Perkel wrote:
The don't seem to have any contact info. Anyone know anything about them?
Whoops - typo. - I mean apews.org
11 matches
Mail list logo