On Wednesday 14 Sep 2005 22:44, jdow wrote:
> From: "Rob Skedgell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Tuesday 13 Sep 2005 21:15, Markus Eskola wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Just a quick question regarding the reporting... Do you guys report
> > all spam (including the once that SA allready caught) or only the
> > o
From: "Rob Skedgell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tuesday 13 Sep 2005 21:15, Markus Eskola wrote:
[...]
Just a quick question regarding the reporting... Do you guys report
all spam (including the once that SA allready caught) or only the
ones that got thru the net?
Currently in my setup I have 3-
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Steve whispered secretively:
> Genius answer! For some reason it had completely escaped my notice
> that all of the spams missed by SA over the past month had a
> uk.geocities.com address! I've opted for a score of 4 for any mail
> mentioning a uk.geocities.com URL - which is
Anybody got an idea
how to prevent that confirmation?
Use spamcop_to_address "quick." instead of "submit." but thats something
you have to activate. The site has further info about this.
On Mittwoch, 14. September 2005 16:12 Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
> Did I also mention the use of quite a few SPAM
> traps and grey listing (both are very effective).
Oh I love those, too *beg*
> Only if you are a registered (paid) user, then it is definetly worth
> reporting and things are listed
I prefer to send it immediately which makes the updates of DCC and
razor even faster.
How do you do it? Do you report back automatically every detected SPAM?
That shouldn't be done, as I read from the homepage.
Not out of the box, I agree with that. I am using 3 threshold levels
and tested,
On Tuesday 13 Sep 2005 21:15, Markus Eskola wrote:
[...]
> Just a quick question regarding the reporting... Do you guys report
> all spam (including the once that SA allready caught) or only the
> ones that got thru the net?
>
> Currently in my setup I have 3-4 diffrent users who move all the s
On Mittwoch, 14. September 2005 14:40 Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
> I prefer to send it immediately which makes the updates of DCC and
> razor even faster.
How do you do it? Do you report back automatically every detected SPAM?
That shouldn't be done, as I read from the homepage.
> What I am not
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 22:15 Markus Eskola wrote:
Just a quick question regarding the reporting... Do you guys report
all spam (including the once that SA allready caught) or only the
ones that got thru the net?
All, with no exceptions made.
I believe it shou
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 22:15 Markus Eskola wrote:
> Just a quick question regarding the reporting... Do you guys report
> all spam (including the once that SA allready caught) or only the
> ones that got thru the net?
All - because others may have other rules, probably not identifying thi
jdow wrote:
I absolutely do not want to report automatically - in the sense that
I am adamant that I want human intervention before reporting.
Conversely - given the task of establishing a remote shell; finding
the correct email in maildir - and verifying it is indeed the mail I
determined w
From: "Steve [Spamassasin]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
You do not say which version of spamassassin you are using. If it is not
3.04 an upgrade might help.
It's 3.04 - the latest stable build that's made it into "Gentoo Portage"
* Is there somewhere where I can report spams which a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 14:06 Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
>
>> If, for example I had an IMAP folder into which I drop spam that
>> my mail server should report on my behalf -then reporting would
>> become far less of
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 17:38 Pedro Sam wrote:
> I haven't been using spamassassin for a while, but last I check,
> "spamassassin -r" will report spam to DCC/pyzor/razor all in one go.
Ah, so it's simple. I already have a script which takes from my SPAM_yes
folder and reports as SPAM, and
Pedro Sam wrote:
> I'm familiar with razor-report, for example - but it is a real pain to
> mess about with this command line tool when all my mail is managed
> remotely over IMAP
I haven't been using spamassassin for a while, but last I check,
"spamassassin -r" will report spam to DCC/pyzor/ra
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Maybe it would be good to report that e-mails to razor, etc. too. I'll
give it a try. Do you have a script to report from IMAP to SA?
I don't... It can't be that hard to do using a polling approach... It
would be neater if this was triggered by the IMAP server... but
Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
> I'm familiar with razor-report, for example - but it is a real pain to
> mess about with this command line tool when all my mail is managed
> remotely over IMAP
I haven't been using spamassassin for a while, but last I check,
"spamassassin -r" will report spam to DCC
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 14:06 Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
>
BTW: is pyzor good / worth the effort? It's latest release is September
7, 2002, for that I thought it wouldn't be used too much anymore. Do
you get enough hits?
On my system, pyzor gets about half as
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 14:06 Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
> If, for
> example I had an IMAP folder into which I drop spam that my mail
> server should report on my behalf -then reporting would become far
> less of a chore.
I'd be interested in this very much. Currently, I move SPAM into a
jdow wrote:
You do not say which version of spamassassin you are using. If it is not
3.04 an upgrade might help.
It's 3.04 - the latest stable build that's made it into "Gentoo Portage"
* Is there somewhere where I can report spams which aren't caught by
the default configuration in
You have a permissions problem, plus you are running duplicate rules..
Remove the tripwire.cf file as you are using a newer version called
99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf
That file was updated months ago with a new name, now it's called
88_FVGT_Tripwire.cf I'm not sure why we changed that but we had good
reaso
From: "Steve [Spamassasin]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm using spamassassin (Razor, Pyzor, DCC) and procmail to filter all my
mail on my (Gentoo) linux-server, to which I connect from a number of
Windows (XP/2000) machines using Mozilla Thunderbird to access my
(dovecot) IMAP folders on the linux s
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Well if this worked. we could make sure we hit the spammers really hard
;-)
While I see eliminating spammers as being one of the better
justifications for environmental warfare, it isn't sufficiently reliable
to get my vote.
of course those unfortunates wh
Hepworth
Subject: Re: Very simple user query...
Martin Hepworth wrote:
>Steve
>
>OK looks like these are both uk.geocities.com abuse spam.
>
>If you look at the archive you'll find some extra rulesets for these little
>blighters (and their variants).
>
>
Genius a
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Steve
OK looks like these are both uk.geocities.com abuse spam.
If you look at the archive you'll find some extra rulesets for these little
blighters (and their variants).
Genius answer! For some reason it had completely escaped my notice that
all of the spams missed
From: Steve [Spamassasin] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 September 2005 14:22
To: Martin Hepworth
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Very simple user query...
Martin Hepworth wrote:
>Steve
>
>Ok looks good. If you can drop an example of a spam that 'gets through'
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Steve
Ok looks good. If you can drop an example of a spam that 'gets through' to a
web page somewhere, I can run it over my system and see what happens.
I've got loads of extra rules (most of rulesemporium.com etc etc so we'll
see what hits...
I should have read your
Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
-Original Message-
From: Steve [Spamassasin] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 September 2005 11:43
To: Martin Hepworth; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Very simple user query...
Martin Hepworth wrote:
>Steve
>
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Steve
OK - what do you get for "spamassassin -D --lint" ??
Output attached: sdlint.txt...
This will give you the list of tests etc its triggering along with things
that might be causing ptoblems. The URI-RBLs are enabled by default in most
config's, but Gentoo migh
Steve
What version of SA and what URI-RBL's are you using??
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
-Original Message-
From: Steve [Spamassasin] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 September 2005 10:27
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subj
On Montag, 12. September 2005 11:27 Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
> Lately I've been less lucky - only ~99% of my spam is marked as
> such...
Same for me: Getting some russian SPAM, which even is only sometimes
recognised by bayes. Could it be problems with cyrillic?
But I even get english SPAM tha
31 matches
Mail list logo
