On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Bob Proulx wrote:
Thomas Cameron wrote:
I believe that would match ... and redirect the e-mail to /dev/null. Am
I right?
I would'nt comment on the exact procmail syntax. I have lots of procmail
rules but wrote them long ago and my memory is getting rusty. I would
commen
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 19:41 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:02:27 -0600
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> > > Unfortunately, no. While procmail implements some flavor of
> > > "extended" Regular Expressions, there are still quite some
> > > differences
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:02:27 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Unfortunately, no. While procmail implements some flavor of
> > "extended" Regular Expressions, there are still quite some
> > differences to other regex engines,
I got sufficiently fed up with procmail that I
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > * ^X-Spam-Level: \*{10}
>
> Unfortunately, no. While procmail implements some flavor of "extended"
> Regular Expressions, there are still quite some differences to other
> regex engines, like egrep's or PCRE. Most notably, the repetition
> opera
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 21:44 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
[ Bunch of good advise snipped. ]
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
> devnull/
>
> Since procmail uses Extended Regular Expressions there is one more
> optimization I would make. I wouldn't list out every star. It gets
> har
On 04/07/2013 10:44 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Thomas Cameron wrote:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level:.*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
I believe that would match 10 asterisks or more, and redirect the
e-mail to /dev/null. Am I right?
Mostly all okay. However I don't like the ".*" in the front of
it. That isn
Thomas Cameron wrote:
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Level:.*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
> /dev/null
>
> I believe that would match 10 asterisks or more, and redirect the
> e-mail to /dev/null. Am I right?
Mostly all okay. However I don't like the ".*" in the front of
it. That isn't likely to cause trouble but it
