Codger wrote:
> Regardless of challenge-response or
> greylisting, [...], the idea is the same...
No, those ideas are very different, both in practice, philosophy and results.
One of them is intended as a verification of the sender, the other is intended
to differentiate between connections fr
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Codger wrote:
> Regardless of challenge-response or greylisting, or SMTP response
> delay, the idea is the same... legitimate email is passed after a
> time delay. My idea was to remove the time delay and in the course
> of normal email communications between known and accept
Yes, everyone is correct that I called a challenge-response
incorrectly as greylisting. Sorry about that. Greylisting on CG Pro
however is implemented a little differently... I can adjust the
initial SMTP response time so it isn't specific to a user but
accomplishes the same thing. Regardle
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Codger wrote:
> My name is Ron, and I run a mail server.
{chorus} Hi, Ron!
> At first I suggested that they simply send to their contact lists
> a request that they respond to the email (with the private keyword
> inserted) without changing it. Now I have suggested they just
Hi Ron,
At 19:09 16-12-2006, Codger wrote:
To our users, I've introduced the concept of a private keyword. This
keyword is quite unique and will cause the responder's email to get
-100 points in the private keyword rule. I've instructed them to put
the private keyword in the bottom of their signa
Codger wrote:
> I wanted to mention something that I've started doing to help those
> of our users who just barely can do email much less discriminate
> email spam from the packaged meat product. This idea may not be new
> at all but Justin Mason suggested that I go ahead and post it to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Codger wrote:
> > I was wondering about anyone's thoughts toward having a real
> > autogreylist database as part of, but separate from, the autowhitelist
> > in SA? Or even if you think this is all a bad thing to do in the first
> > place. The appeal