>
> Again thanks so much Loren!
Quite welcome. It was a fun hack to think through.
There is one fix required in that file - change the word 'hits' to 'score'
in the rules. I wrote those based off a 2.64 example, and the word changed
in 3.0.
Loren
Loren Wilton wrote:
Any hints are graciously accepted and greatly appreciated.
You can't, so far as I know, do exactly what you want. However, you may be
able to come close.
Oh heck. I started the ruleset above, I just finished the thing. File
attached.
Note these rules are UNTESTED, and m
> It wasn't clear from the documentation or google searches that I could
> do this. It seemed that I could create a header and then give a score
> based upon its presence. But it wasn't obvious to me that I could
> actually read the headers value and set the initial spam score from the
> value. An
