On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, RW wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:13:11 +0100 Benjamin Copeland wrote:
This got X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
I'd turn-off auto-learning. You definitely need to clear the existing
database.
Seco
On 28.04.15 11:52, Benjamin Copeland wrote:
I run mailman on Ubuntu 14.04 with Postfix.
It has been setup from the Ubuntu packages.
The problem I have is there is there are a large amount of spam coming
through, which spamassassin does not seem to be giving a high enough
score and discarding.
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:13:11 +0100
Benjamin Copeland wrote:
> On 28 April 2015 at 12:25, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> > that score does look very low, especially for those rules that
> > fired, even with the BAYES_00.
>
> Yup, that is what I thought, all the spam levels seem very low in my
> message
On 28 April 2015 at 12:25, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> that score does look very low, especially for those rules that fired, even
> with the BAYES_00.
Yup, that is what I thought, all the spam levels seem very low in my messages.
*** Final Notice ***
This notice is to inform you your factory warr
Am 28.04.2015 um 13:31 schrieb Benjamin Copeland:
The script chown's the mbox, that being said I have now added the -u
option in.
Don't do that unless you have multiple virtual users configured and
genuinely need it.
Indeed, I read man page.
I had to add debian-spamd to lists user (mailman
On 28 April 2015 at 12:18, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:10:15 +0100
> Benjamin Copeland wrote:
>
>> On 28 April 2015 at 12:01, Christian Laußat
>> wrote:
>> > Am 28.04.2015 12:52, schrieb Benjamin Copeland:
>> >>
>> >> Any suggestions on how I can improve this?
>> >
>> >
>> > Which user are
that score does look very low, especially for those rules that fired, even
with the BAYES_00.
I'd look to make sure you're adding the scores for the rules in the headers
as well as the rules that fired so you see if you've got another rule score
with a big negative number
--
Martin Hepworth, CI
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:10:15 +0100
Benjamin Copeland wrote:
> On 28 April 2015 at 12:01, Christian Laußat
> wrote:
> > Am 28.04.2015 12:52, schrieb Benjamin Copeland:
> >>
> >> Any suggestions on how I can improve this?
> >
> >
> > Which user are you running the script as? Is it the same user as
Am 28.04.2015 um 13:10 schrieb Benjamin Copeland:
On 28 April 2015 at 12:01, Christian Laußat
wrote:
Am 28.04.2015 12:52, schrieb Benjamin Copeland:
Any suggestions on how I can improve this?
Which user are you running the script as? Is it the same user as your
mailserver is invoking spam
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:01:04 +0200
Christian Laußat wrote:
> Am 28.04.2015 12:52, schrieb Benjamin Copeland:
> > Any suggestions on how I can improve this?
>
> Which user are you running the script as? Is it the same user as your
> mailserver is invoking spamassassin?
>
> You should use the -u
On 28 April 2015 at 12:01, Christian Laußat
wrote:
> Am 28.04.2015 12:52, schrieb Benjamin Copeland:
>>
>> Any suggestions on how I can improve this?
>
>
> Which user are you running the script as? Is it the same user as your
> mailserver is invoking spamassassin?
I manually run it, I run it as
Am 28.04.2015 12:52, schrieb Benjamin Copeland:
Any suggestions on how I can improve this?
Which user are you running the script as? Is it the same user as your
mailserver is invoking spamassassin?
You should use the -u option for sa-learn to set the right user.
--
Christian Laußat
https://
12 matches
Mail list logo
