Am 2008-06-04 10:45:20, schrieb Dan Barker:
> I can read 10 messages, I can't read 200. The bounces I see are usually due
> to messages sent by my webserver (password request) by folks who type their
What about updating your Webserver script first,
to let users type the password twice?
Greetings
On Thu, June 5, 2008 10:10, Obantec Support wrote:
>> meta BOUNCED_SPAM (ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE && BAYES_99)
>> score BOUNCED_SPAM 4.0
> how do i impliment the above?
put them in user_prefs or local.cf
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
ram wrote:
You might be surprised , but that is not exactly true. I have seen a lot
of backscatter from Cisco Ironports.
Most Ironport boxes dont do any address verification at the time
accepting mail, and then send NDR's. But if these are getting SPF fail,
then these messaged may get discarded
- Original Message -
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Undeliverable mails
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Obantec Support wrote:
i looked over the above and m
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 18:24 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Wed, June 4, 2008 17:11, mouss wrote:
>
> > If they can't configure their system to reject invalid recipients at
> > smtp time, there is no hope that they will setup SPF checking correctly!
>
> it was olso my conclusion after i have w
On Wednesday, June 4, 2008, 7:04:50 AM, Jack Gostl wrote:
> I'm not sure if this can even be handled, but I thought I'd put it out there.
> Someone is using our email address to originate spam. We are
> getting bombed with "Mail undeliverable" etc. messages from
> failed spam delivery attempts. Th
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Obantec Support wrote:
i looked over the above and my server seems to conform but it still scores
low on an example email.
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on my.mailserver.net
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=4.5 tests=ANY_BOUN
On Wed, June 4, 2008 17:11, mouss wrote:
> If they can't configure their system to reject invalid recipients at
> smtp time, there is no hope that they will setup SPF checking correctly!
it was olso my conclusion after i have writed it :-)
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage
- Original Message -
From: "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: Undeliverable mails
On Wed, June 4, 2008 16:04, Jack Gostl wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions?
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydoma
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, June 4, 2008 16:45, Dan Barker wrote:
Trying to educate the sysadmins producing the backscatter is a hopeless
cause (imo).
first problem to solve is bounce and not reject
you mean the opposite.
if sysadmins wonder why there server bounces alot of ma
On Wed, June 4, 2008 16:45, Dan Barker wrote:
> Trying to educate the sysadmins producing the backscatter is a hopeless
> cause (imo).
first problem to solve is bounce and not reject
if sysadmins wonder why there server bounces alot of mail we could reduce the
problem there
maybe i am ignorant
That's exactly what VBounce is for. If a bounce message does not contain
your MTA, it's either backscatter (safe to delete) or useless (from AOHell,
for example). If you can't track the source, you don't need to see it. I get
about 10 legitimate bounces a day, and VBounce takes care of about 200
ba
On Wed, June 4, 2008 16:04, Jack Gostl wrote:
> Does anyone have any suggestions?
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=argoscomp.com&submit=Go%21
could be a start
and use pypolicyd-spf for testing
and if you get mails from remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] then contackt them if
recived path mat
13 matches
Mail list logo
