Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST false negative

2005-01-05 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:10 PM 1/5/2005, Rainer Sokoll wrote: > If the lockfile exists, some SA process is currently writing the DB, and > autolearning cannot occur. Since autolearning isn't a critical operation, > SA skips autolearning, Does this trigger "autolearn=unavailable", which I see from time to time in the

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST false negative

2005-01-05 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 02:39:57PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > If the lockfile exists, some SA process is currently writing the DB, and > autolearning cannot occur. Since autolearning isn't a critical operation, > SA skips autolearning, Does this trigger "autolearn=unavailable", which I see fr

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST false negative

2005-01-05 Thread Michael Parker
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:20:35PM +, Quinn Comendant wrote: > Oh boy do I need some help. > > I've got SpamAssassin 3.0.2 running on a RedHat 7.2 system with sendmail, > configured sitewide to use bayes and auto-whitelist. local.cf is as follows: > Interesting that you think you are running

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST false negative

2005-01-05 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:20 PM 1/5/2005, Quinn Comendant wrote: 1. USER_IN_WHITELIST is causing the low score. User has no whitelist, in fact has no custom user settings whatsoever. Are you sure the message got processed as that user? Question: Therefore the site-wide shared auto-whitelist.db is causing this flag, y