On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 7:28:53 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been watching some of the misses that have passed through
> spamassassin (3.0.4) lately and they are pretty clean; no DNS BL hits,
> etc.
> One thing I did notice is that many of them have a fairly contorted URL
>
>...
>On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
>> Sounds like an surbl problem if spamsite.com isn't listed.
>
>That's just an example I made up... :)
>...
Bad choice of example: spamsite. com is an actual "spamsite".
The domain "example.com" is reserved for exactly this type of usage
a
> OK, so that's supposed to happen. Is there any way to have the entire
> host checked? I've seen a good volume of junk where the domain is clean,
> but if I do a manual lookup on the entire hostname in the spam it is
> indeed listed.
I *suspect* what is happening here is that the domain isn't i
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
Sounds like an surbl problem if spamsite.com isn't listed.
That's just an example I made up... :)
The leading subdomains are supposed to be trimmed off, since they are
usually identifying strings for a given spam target rather than an
actual part of
Sounds like an surbl problem if spamsite.com isn't listed. The leading
subdomains are supposed to be trimmed off, since they are usually
identifying strings for a given spam target rather than an actual part of
the target name. There are a few cases where things go to three levels
rather than jus
