natan skrev den 2024-03-15 09:30:
Yes but this disable all URIBL_* where I use *.spamhouse.net
i never asked you to add *
now you know your own mistake, good weekend
Hi
Yes but this disable all URIBL_* where I use *.spamhouse.net
I have spamassassin-3.4.6 and URIBL_* works fine but payment is not so cool
W dniu 14.03.2024 o 22:21, Benny Pedersen pisze:
natan skrev den 2024-03-14 16:04:
in 00_init_dns.cf:
# dns_query_restriction (allow|deny) domain1 domai
natan skrev den 2024-03-14 16:04:
in 00_init_dns.cf:
# dns_query_restriction (allow|deny) domain1 domain2 .
dns_query_restriction allow dq.spamhaus.net
dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.net
...
In: /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/
do not edit or add any new fil
W dniu 14.03.2024 o 13:13, Benny Pedersen pisze:
natan skrev den 2024-03-14 12:20:
I have disable only spamahause rules
URIBL_SBL URIBL_CSS URIBL_SBL_A URIBL_CSS_A URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS
URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED URIBL_DBL_SPAM URIBL_DBL_PHISH
URIBL_DBL_MALWARE URIBL_DBL_BOTNETCC URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SP
natan skrev den 2024-03-14 12:20:
I have disable only spamahause rules
URIBL_SBL URIBL_CSS URIBL_SBL_A URIBL_CSS_A URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS
URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED URIBL_DBL_SPAM URIBL_DBL_PHISH
URIBL_DBL_MALWARE URIBL_DBL_BOTNETCC URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SPAM
URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_REDIR URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_PHISH
URI
From: "Dojja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cami wrote:
Hi All,
A specific message is hitting the following rule:
* 5 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
* [URIs: annealbatross.org]
The sender would like to know how to fix it and i
am unable to find any refer
Cami wrote:
Dojja wrote:
Cami wrote:
A specific message is hitting the following rule:
* 5 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
* [URIs: annealbatross.org]
This is not clear at all, i can not see what list it is on
because it does not mention what i
Title: RE: URIBL_SBL
> -Original Message-
> From: Cami [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:45 AM
> To: Spamassasin Users List
> Subject: Re: URIBL_SBL
>
>
> Dojja wrote:
> > Cami wrote:
> >
> >>A s
Dojja wrote:
Cami wrote:
A specific message is hitting the following rule:
* 5 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
* [URIs: annealbatross.org]
The sender would like to know how to fix it and i
am unable to find any reference anywhere on the
procedure st
>Hi All,
>
>A specific message is hitting the following rule:
>
> * 5 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
> * [URIs: annealbatross.org]
>
>The sender would like to know how to fix it and i
>am unable to find any reference anywhere on the
>procedure stating
Cami wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A specific message is hitting the following rule:
>
> * 5 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
> * [URIs: annealbatross.org]
>
> The sender would like to know how to fix it and i
> am unable to find any reference anywhere on the
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi Jeremy --
you're dead right, I see that URL appearing with svn trunk too:
[24517] dbg: uri: parsed uri found, illas.com
[24517] dbg: uri: cleaned parsed uri, illas.com
[24517] dbg: uri: cleaned parsed uri, http://illas.com
This appears to be a b
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:02:49PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> I also tried editing the first line to "@getawayillas.com" and then
> all the HTTP URI bits and the domains to query became "llas.com"
>
> Since when does "getawa" parse as http:/ ??
>
> I think the parser is getting very confused.
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:06:35AM -0500, Jeremy Kister wrote:
> 1.1 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
> [URIs: illas.com]
>
> in fact, what I sent was a lot of email addresses at getawayvillas.com
>
> Note: It's only the URIBL_SBL tha
Jeremy Kister wrote:
> I noticed that after I sent an email, it got tagged with an incorrect rule:
>
> 1.1 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
> [URIs: illas.com]
>
> in fact, what I sent was a lot of email addresses at getawayvillas.com
On Sep 14, 2005, at 5:12 PM, jdow wrote:
jdow a écrit :
Am I alone in having a perception that using mimedefang and
amavis-new
is its own punishment?
At the time I started using SA what
I had available was procmail.
Procmail works if your users have access to the right things for
in
From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow a écrit :
Am I alone in having a perception that using mimedefang and amavis-new
is its own punishment?
why do you say so?
(I should have said or instead of and. "And" is REAL punishment even if
"or" is not. It may not even be possible.)
The short st
jdow a écrit :
Am I alone in having a perception that using mimedefang and amavis-new
is its own punishment?
why do you say so?
From: "Sean Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
This morning after having upgraded all installed ports on a FreeBSD
mail
gateway machine running postfix, amavisd-new, clamav and spamassassin,
it appears that spamassassin is no longer working the way it had been.
Specifically it seems that the
Hello,
> This morning after having upgraded all installed ports on a FreeBSD
mail
> gateway machine running postfix, amavisd-new, clamav and spamassassin,
> it appears that spamassassin is no longer working the way it had been.
> Specifically it seems that the URIBL_SBL test isn't being applied,
Sean Greene wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This morning after having upgraded all installed ports on a FreeBSD mail
> gateway machine running postfix, amavisd-new, clamav and spamassassin,
> it appears that spamassassin is no longer working the way it had been.
> Specifically it seems that the URIBL_SBL test
On Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 8:20:33 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> What this means is that the nameserver for gov.ru is listed
> in SBL.
> http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL13545
>> Ref: SBL13545
>>
>> 213.59.0.0/23 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)
>>
>> 26-Feb-2005 02:47 GMT
At 10:50 AM 3/9/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone explain to me what the URIBL_SBL rule does (I.e. which list Is
used)
I have an email that this rule catches because of a email address inside it.
The SpamAssassin report lists it as :
0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blockli
>
>> The SpamAssassin report lists it as :
>> 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
>> [URIs: gov.ru]
>
>> But no matter what I try, I can´t find the blacklist that Is used.
>
>What this means is that the nameserver for gov.ru is listed
>in SBL.
>
> http://www
On Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 7:50:13 AM, Rikhardur EGILSSON wrote:
> Can anyone explain to me what the URIBL_SBL rule does (I.e. which list Is
> used)
RTFM?
uridnsbl checks a URI domain's nameserver against
sbl.spamhaus.org.
> I have an email that this rule catches because of a email address ins
Works now.
Thanks.
Matt
Matt
install Net::DNS from CPAN
perl -MCPAN -eshell
install Net::DNS
the RH RPMs are nortious at sticking stuff in stupid places that only
other RH RPM based packages can see.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Matt wrote
Matt
install Net::DNS from CPAN
perl -MCPAN -eshell
install Net::DNS
the RH RPMs are nortious at sticking stuff in stupid places that only
other RH RPM based packages can see.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Matt wrote:
Alright, I think I ha
On Monday, January 17, 2005, 11:57:26 PM, Matt Matt wrote:
> Alright, I think I have figured something out by turning spamd -D debug
> mode on.
> Net::DNS version is 0.23, but need 0.34dnsavailable-1 at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 1230.
> Thing is I just inst
Alright, I think I have figured something out by turning spamd -D debug
mode on.
Net::DNS version is 0.23, but need 0.34dnsavailable-1 at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 1230.
Thing is I just installed "perl-Net-DNS-0.48-0.1.fc2.rf.i386.rpm". So I
double check.
I just installed the latest version of 0.48 Net::DNS and still no go.
This is how I start Spamd in rc.local.
/usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m 5
This is running under Exim Exiscan. Looks like it uses spamc -u to connect
to spamd as a given user.
Any other ideas?
Thanks.
Matthew
On Monday, January 17, 200
On Monday, January 17, 2005, 6:01:28 PM, Matt Matt wrote:
> I have SpamAssassin 3.0.2 installed on Fedora Core 2 release. How do I get
> URIBL_SBL to work?
> I see in "25_uribl.cf":
> # Requires the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL plugin be loaded.
> # Note that this plugin defines a new c
31 matches
Mail list logo
