On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 01:29 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Keep in mind, the actual number of queries isn't relevant unless you're
> at least in the general ball-park of 100,000 messages a day.
>
Indeed: I'm not remotely near that. It was just an idea that I thought
might be useful provided
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 01:29 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 23:52 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 19:22 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > wonder if it would be useful for SA to log the number of BL lookups it
> > does: as it need only involve o
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 23:52 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 19:22 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > [...] there is one DNS lookup per URI and
> > DNSBL -- e.g. SURBL (multiple lists) or URIBL (multiple listings).
>
> OK, so the answer is not straight forward: thanks for
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 19:22 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:51 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > I've just been thinking about URIBL lookups, etc and realising that I
> > don't know how many of these an SA configuration does or how to estimate
> > it.
> >
> > Is it co
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:51 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> I've just been thinking about URIBL lookups, etc and realising that I
> don't know how many of these an SA configuration does or how to estimate
> it.
>
> Is it correct to assume that every configured URIBL is sent a single
> lookup requ
