Re: URI obfuscation check

2004-09-17 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > SpamCop got fooled by this URI obfuscation, so I wrote them about > it. Would someone please feed it through SA to see if it handles > it correctly: It doesn't matter because the message had a score of 19. In 2.64, it had a score of 11. With network test

Re: URI obfuscation check

2004-09-17 Thread Ryan Thompson
Jeff Chan wrote to SpamAssassin Users: Update on the previous, interestingly the HTML renderer in The Bat! 1.62q did not make the link clickable, but the plaintext message renderer did. That's because the HTML did not actually contain a link (anchor); just the plaintext URI. Many plaintext renderer

Re: URI obfuscation check

2004-09-17 Thread Jeff Chan
Update on the previous, interestingly the HTML renderer in The Bat! 1.62q did not make the link clickable, but the plaintext message renderer did. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/