On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Henry F. Camacho, Jr. wrote:
> You are seeing the child of spamd. Both are not taking 20 megs of
> memory, that is the shared memory allocation. I think what you are
> seeing is the shared memory being applied to each of the other
> processes because spamd uses linux threads.
On Sonntag, 12. Februar 2006 20:59 Jan Krumsiek wrote:
> Is this really the same process with two threads?
Run "pstree -p"
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc --- it-management Michael Monnerie
// http://zmi.at Tel: 0660/4156531 Linux 2.6.11
// PGP Key: "lynx -source
Henry F. Camacho Jr schrieb:
>> You are seeing the child of spamd. Both are not taking 20 megs of
>> memory, that is the shared memory allocation. I think what you are
>> seeing is the shared memory being applied to each of the other processes
>> because spamd uses linux threads.
Are you sure?
You are seeing the child of spamd. Both are not taking 20 megs of
memory, that is the shared memory allocation. I think what you are
seeing is the shared memory being applied to each of the other processes
because spamd uses linux threads.
HFC
Jan Krumsiek wrote:
Hi.
We need to run spamd
spamd --max-children=1 &
would you like to say this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# ps[9538] info: spamd: server started on port
783/tcp (running version 3.1.0)
[9538] info: spamd: server pid: 9538
[9538] info: spamd: server successfully spawned child process, pid 9541
[9538] info: prefork: ch
