Benny,
Thanks for noticing my spf error. I used the wizard to fix it.
Mike
On Sun, July 19, 2009 20:11, Mike Wallace wrote:
> It was Dan's rule, so I switched to your rule and it was caught.
> Sorry, first time posting on this list.
thats okay, no one is imho perfekt here on this maillist :)
i just sav that you have error in your spf record
http://old.openspf.org/wiza
From: McDonald, Dan [mailto:dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com]
>From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
>>On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Mike Wallace wrote:
>>
>>> I got one today that wasn't caught by your rule
>>
>>Whose, mine or Dan's?
>>
>>> it had 22232 for the domain name inside of www and net and us
From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
>On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Mike Wallace wrote:
>
>> I got one today that wasn't caught by your rule
>
>Whose, mine or Dan's?
>
>> it had 22232 for the domain name inside of www and net and used bracket
>> dot bracket for the separator.
I just got a couple
It was Dan's rule, so I switched to your rule and it was caught.
Sorry, first time posting on this list.
Mike
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Mike Wallace wrote:
I got one today that wasn't caught by your rule
Whose, mine or Dan's?
it had 22232 for the domain name inside of www and net and used bracket
dot bracket for the separator.
My URI_OBFU_WWW rule (from the SA sandbox) should have caught that. Dan's
i
I got one today that wasn't caught by your rule it had 22232 for the
domain name inside of www and net and used bracket dot bracket for the
separator.
Mike
On Jul 16, 2009, at 6:23 PM, McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 00:04 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Good Evening,
Am 2009-
On Fri, July 17, 2009 11:14, Justin Mason wrote:
>> I have scored it with 10.00 because the stupid AWL which scores in 30%
>> of all cases with -5.00.
score AWL 10
?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL
see factor
> sounds like you should turn off the AWL?
it works for me :)
--
xpoint
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:45, Michelle
Konzack wrote:
> Am 2009-07-17 09:46:28, schrieb Ben:
>> Dan,
>>
>> Thanks for the rules.
>>
>> I am using "AE_MED42" from a previous thread, is this "AE_MED44" meant
>> to replace this or work in addition to it?
>>
>> Also just curious, why the low score? W
Am 2009-07-17 09:46:28, schrieb Ben:
> Dan,
>
> Thanks for the rules.
>
> I am using "AE_MED42" from a previous thread, is this "AE_MED44" meant
> to replace this or work in addition to it?
>
> Also just curious, why the low score? With the default required hits of
> 5.0 and this in my setup
McDonald, Dan wrote:
Have you tried my rule? I've caught 401 of them since I updated it this
morning. It's also got a little surprise for the next logical
variant...
body__MED_OB
/\bw{2,3}(?:[[:punct:][:space:]]{1,5}|[[:space:][:punct:]]{1,3}dot[[:space:][:punct:]]{1,3})[[:alpha:]]
Am 2009-07-16 17:23:41, schrieb McDonald, Dan:
> Have you tried my rule?
Installed for some minutes... will see how many it catch.
> I've caught 401 of them since I updated it this
> morning. It's also got a little surprise for the next logical
> variant...
>
> body __MED_OB
> /\bw{2
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
Hi,
Is this rule available via updates.spamassassin.org sa-update channel?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_uri_obfu_ws.cf
Not at present. Stuff in the sandbox is still undergoing testing and
evaluation.
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 00:04 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Good Evening,
>
> Am 2009-07-16 23:42:44, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 00:37 +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
> > > Is this rule available via updates.spamassassin.org sa-update channel?
> >
> > Nope. It's living
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 01:02 +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
> How can I get them into my spamassassin rules automatically
svn
> or manually?
Click the link. Then use the "download" link, preferably for HEAD.
Copy-n-paste the rule in some *.cf file of your choice in your *site*
specific configura
Am 2009-07-16 11:47:16, schrieb rich...@buzzhost.co.uk:
> Don't you just love them :-)
>
> Love Making Tipps -- Tips for Better And Greater
> sex.www[dot]nu26[dot]com
The only thing I love is the use of my "Makarow"... charged for spamers!
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konz
Good Evening,
Am 2009-07-16 23:42:44, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 00:37 +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
> > Is this rule available via updates.spamassassin.org sa-update channel?
>
> Nope. It's living in a sandbox.
>
> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/r
Hi,
How can I get them into my spamassassin rules automatically or manually?
Thanks
2009/7/17 Karsten Bräckelmann :
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 00:37 +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
>> Is this rule available via updates.spamassassin.org sa-update channel?
>
> Nope. It's living in a sandbox.
>
>> > h
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 00:37 +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
> Is this rule available via updates.spamassassin.org sa-update channel?
Nope. It's living in a sandbox.
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_uri_obfu_ws.cf
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4
Hi,
Is this rule available via updates.spamassassin.org sa-update channel?
Thansk
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Randal,
Phil wrote:
> John Hardin wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:47 +0100, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>>> Don't you just love them :-)
>>>
>>> Love Making Tipps -- Tips for B
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 09:11 -0400, Dan Schaefer wrote:
> > The rules should also proactively cover (dot) and {dot} as well as [dot]
and , and {dot>, and /dot/, and ...
That's why I like using [[:punct:]], which includes ! ' # S % & ' ( ) *
+ , - . / : ; < = > ? @ [ \ ] ^ _ { | } ~
I've simplifi
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 14:08 +0100, Randal, Phil wrote:
> John Hardin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:47 +0100, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> >> Don't you just love them :-)
> >>
> >> Love Making Tipps -- Tips for Better And Greater
> >> sex.www[dot]nu26[dot]com
> >
>
> http://svn.apache.org
The rules should also proactively cover (dot) and {dot} as well as [dot]
I agree.
--
Dan Schaefer
Web Developer/Systems Analyst
Performance Administration Corp.
John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:47 +0100, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>> Don't you just love them :-)
>>
>> Love Making Tipps -- Tips for Better And Greater
>> sex.www[dot]nu26[dot]com
>
>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/
20_uri_obfu_ws.cf
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:47 +0100, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> Don't you just love them :-)
>
> Love Making Tipps -- Tips for Better And Greater
> sex.www[dot]nu26[dot]com
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_uri_obfu_ws.cf
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 13:43 +0200, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
[snip]
> (Of course every good spammer will read the spamassassin list ;-)
I don't think they care that much. Once you've got the mail server to
accept it, ending up in a junk folder is still a successful delivery.
If you are running it s
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Thu, July 16, 2009 12:47, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > Don't you just love them :-)
Well, I seem to remember the nearly same scenario a long while ago.
Somebody went through nearly the same 'contorions' to always avoid
the last 'matching' which
On Thu, July 16, 2009 12:47, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> Don't you just love them :-)
>
> Love Making Tipps -- Tips for Better And Greater
> sex.www[dot]nu26[dot]com
lets start block tld with score 100, and on known uri score -100
--
xpoint
28 matches
Mail list logo
