Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Ober
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Robert Ober wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:19:57 -0600: "score FH-DATE-PAST-20XX 0.0" which is wrong, the rule has underscores. Read the article on http://spamassassin.apache.org/ Kai Thanks, I cut and pasted that from someone's forum post. Fortunately sa-

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Robert Ober wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:19:57 -0600: > "score FH-DATE-PAST-20XX 0.0" which is wrong, the rule has underscores. Read the article on http://spamassassin.apache.org/ Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 1/19/10 9:19 AM, "Robert Ober" wrote: > Daniel McDonald wrote: >> >> On 1/19/10 9:02 AM, "Robert Ober" wrote: >> >> >>> Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem >>> persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 >>> from that distribution.

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Warren Togami
On 01/19/2010 10:47 AM, Robert Ober wrote: Warren Togami wrote: Did you enable sa-update? That will get rid of the broken rule as well. Warren I did not think it was enabled on that machine but it was. I ran sa-update and problem solved. Sorry to 'bother y'all, I should have checked for sa-up

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Ober
Warren Togami wrote: Did you enable sa-update? That will get rid of the broken rule as well. Warren I did not think it was enabled on that machine but it was. I ran sa-update and problem solved. Sorry to 'bother y'all, I should have checked for sa-update. Thanks, Robert A. Ober

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Warren Togami
Did you enable sa-update? That will get rid of the broken rule as well. Warren

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Ober
Daniel McDonald wrote: On 1/19/10 9:02 AM, "Robert Ober" wrote: Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 from that distribution. They have no newer according to yum. The local.cf fix did not c

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 1/19/10 9:02 AM, "Robert Ober" wrote: > Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem > persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 > from that distribution. They have no newer according to yum. The > local.cf fix did not change anything after