On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 12:23 -0800, Robert - elists wrote:
> > Sounds like you've been hit by bug 5519 [1] before the upgrade in Oct.
> > Setting rules scores to 0 did *not* prevent these tests from being
> > evaluated for SA 3.2.x before 3.2.3.
> >
> > Fixed since 3.2.3. Plugin eval rules with 0
>
> Sounds like you've been hit by bug 5519 [1] before the upgrade in Oct.
> Setting rules scores to 0 did *not* prevent these tests from being
> evaluated for SA 3.2.x before 3.2.3.
>
> Fixed since 3.2.3. Plugin eval rules with 0 scores are meant no not be
> evaluated, and of course to not sho
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 18:03 +, Arthur Dent wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm afraid that I might have wasted your time - Hence the change to the thread
> Subject.
>
> I guess that what triggered my original question was the fact that I was
> trying to check that everything was working following an