Re: Test results differ when input from MTA vs spamc cmdline

2016-02-22 Thread Tino de Bruijn
> On 15 Feb 2016, at 02:12, John Hardin wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, RW wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 12:22:36 +0800 >> Tino de Bruijn wrote: >> >>> I have some trouble filtering my spam, as everything I try from the >>> commandline works fine (spamc -t < spam.eml , where spam.eml is a >>

Re: Test results differ when input from MTA vs spamc cmdline

2016-02-21 Thread Tino de Bruijn
> On 15 Feb 2016, at 02:12, John Hardin wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, RW wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 12:22:36 +0800 >> Tino de Bruijn wrote: >> >>> I have some trouble filtering my spam, as everything I try from the >>> commandline works fine (spamc -t < spam.eml , where spam.eml is a >>

Re: Test results differ when input from MTA vs spamc cmdline

2016-02-14 Thread John Hardin
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, RW wrote: On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 12:22:36 +0800 Tino de Bruijn wrote: I have some trouble filtering my spam, as everything I try from the commandline works fine (spamc -t < spam.eml , where spam.eml is a spam message i dragged out of Mail.app and uploaded to the server), but

Re: Test results differ when input from MTA vs spamc cmdline

2016-02-14 Thread RW
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 12:22:36 +0800 Tino de Bruijn wrote: > Hi, > > I have some trouble filtering my spam, as everything I try from the > commandline works fine (spamc -t < spam.eml , where spam.eml is a > spam message i dragged out of Mail.app and uploaded to the server), > but when delivered to

Re: Test results differ when input from MTA vs spamc cmdline

2016-02-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 14.02.2016 um 05:22 schrieb Tino de Bruijn: I have some trouble filtering my spam, as everything I try from the commandline works fine (spamc -t < spam.eml , where spam.eml is a spam message i dragged out of Mail.app and uploaded to the server), but when delivered to SA by my MTA (Haraka), i