Bowie Bailey wrote:
LDB wrote:
I am invoking spamc through a filter script where spamd is
listening. Also, I am using PostFix as the MTA. My platform is
Debian Linux. I am SA version 3.0.3.
The below config. captures about 1700 spams a day but it is NOT
enough.
Can anyone kindly suggest a
mouss wrote:
LDB wrote:
I am invoking spamc through a filter script where spamd is listening.
Also, I am using PostFix as the MTA. My platform is Debian Linux. I am
SA version 3.0.3.
The below config. captures about 1700 spams a day but it is NOT enough.
- Add some SARE rules.
- enable URIBL
LDB wrote:
I am invoking spamc through a filter script where spamd is listening.
Also, I am using PostFix as the MTA. My platform is Debian Linux. I am
SA version 3.0.3.
The below config. captures about 1700 spams a day but it is NOT enough.
- Add some SARE rules.
- enable URIBL
- add uribl r
LDB wrote:
> I am invoking spamc through a filter script where spamd is
> listening. Also, I am using PostFix as the MTA. My platform is
> Debian Linux. I am SA version 3.0.3.
>
> The below config. captures about 1700 spams a day but it is NOT
> enough.
>
> Can anyone kindly suggest a better m
LDB wrote:
I am invoking spamc through a filter script where spamd is listening.
Also, I am using PostFix as the MTA. My platform is Debian Linux. I am
SA version 3.0.3.
The below config. captures about 1700 spams a day but it is NOT enough.
Can anyone kindly suggest a better more strict conf