On Jul 6, 2007, at 05:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just out of curiosity: would the codes WKN or ISIN (in the same mail)
make any sense, other than in the context of stocks?
http://www.google.com/search?q=ISIN+WKN
Results 1 - 10 of about 2,540,000 for ISIN WKN. (0.04 seconds)
Looks like Ger
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
http://www.forbes.com/security/2007/06/20/stock-spam-internet-tech-security-cx_ag_0620spam.html
Got like 7 of them, all look pretty much like this:
X-Spam-Report:
* 5.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 0.9998]
Hi Stefan,
I get a lot of these Spam mails:
http://home.arcor.de/stefan_jakobs/spam-mail.txt.
And spamassassin doesn't recognise them. Here is the X-Spam header:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11]
I'm using amavisd-new 2.3.3 and Spamassassin 3.1.
]
> Sent: 22 February 2007 15:33
> To: SpamAssassin List
> Subject: Re: Stock Spam Getting Through
>
> This might be identical to one I got today. I put it up clean at:
> http://2chronicles36.org/spam/stock.txt
>
> I'm also on 3.1.7 with latest update, all the net
This might be identical to one I got today. I put it up clean at:
http://2chronicles36.org/spam/stock.txt
I'm also on 3.1.7 with latest update, all the network tests, plus
FuzzyOcr.cf and KAM.cf, otherwise no extras.
Andy Figueroa
David Goldsmith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Ha
On Nov 29, 2006, at 6:16 PM, san wrote:
Yeah Giampaolo. with 3.1x it should be alright. But my superior is
still
stick to the old one..:(
Does he also use 3 year old antivirus software with no updates? At
least updating SA is pretty much zero cost other than a few minutes
of time.
Thanks loren..let me invoke bayes and try it out
Loren Wilton wrote:
>
>> Thanks for ur inputs. when i put across SA this is what i get on my pc..
>> Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 4.5 required)
>>
>> pts rule name description
>> --
>>
Thanks for ur inputs. when i put across SA this is what i get on my pc..
Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 4.5 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
1.0 Local_Signup BODY: Body mentions Sign
I am recieving lot of stock related spam mails which spam assassin is not
able catch as spam. I have added Sare_stcok.cf file. I cant use imageinfo,
fuzzy ocr as iam using 2.6o ver of spam assassin i think. I have enclosed
the undecoded letter mail of one kind below. Can you plz help me to make
th
Yeah Giampaolo. with 3.1x it should be alright. But my superior is still
stick to the old one..:(
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>
> From: san [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Thanks for ur inputs. when i put across SA this is what i get on my pc..
>> Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 4.5 requi
It's time to switch to 3.1.7, San. Isn't it? :)
giampaolo
It was time a long time ago. :-)
The upgrade is good. sa-update is a useful tool.
From: san [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks for ur inputs. when i put across SA this is what i get on my pc..
> Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 4.5 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> --
> --
>
Thanks for ur inputs. when i put across SA this is what i get on my pc..
Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 4.5 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
1.0 Local_Signup BODY: Body mentions Sig
From: san [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:33 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Stock Spam
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am recieving lot of stock related spam mails which spam assassin is not
> able catch as spam. I have added Sare_stcok.cf file. I cant
Yes thats true but as of now in my office we are using 2.6x. Is there any
rules to catch in 2.6x?
Right now the score it is genarating is more than 3 and need another 2 to
mark as spam.
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:33:02PM -0800, san wrote:
>> able catch as spam. I h
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:33:02PM -0800, san wrote:
> able catch as spam. I have added Sare_stcok.cf file. I cant use imageinfo,
> fuzzy ocr as iam using 2.6o ver of spam assassin i think. I have enclosed
> the undecoded letter mail of one kind below. Can you plz help me to make
> this kind of mai
Jason Haar wrote:
I'm having marvelous luck with FuzzyOCR - but the spammers are learning too.
When I first started using it just a couple of months ago, it really
whacked the image-based spam. You could see why when "gocr file.gif"
returned nice text that was easy to match against.
However, no
Title: RE: Stock spam in images
Greetings list,
The old timers on the list know I tend to try things outside the norm. Like my strong resistence to sitewide bayes. Well for months I've been using a simpler approach to these Stock Spams w/ images. I don't look at the im
I'm having marvelous luck with FuzzyOCR - but the spammers are learning too.
When I first started using it just a couple of months ago, it really
whacked the image-based spam. You could see why when "gocr file.gif"
returned nice text that was easy to match against.
However, now is a different mat
For Debian Users I've found the follow link, a step by step guide in
order to implement FuzzyOCR and ImageInfo with spamassassin.
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/image_spam.html
Andrea
On Tue, October 3, 2006 00:01, Gary V wrote:
>> For installing the ImageInfo plugin where do you put the ImageInfo.pm
>> without defining a path? Im running CentOS4.4 & Fedora Core 5 as test
>> machines.
> This should find your Plugin directory (which is where you place it):
> find /usr -type d -
For installing the ImageInfo plugin where do you put the ImageInfo.pm
without defining a path? Im running CentOS4.4 & Fedora Core 5 as test
machines.
Thanks!
Wilson
This should find your Plugin directory (which is where you place it):
find /usr -type d -name Plugin
Gary V
> -Original Message-
> From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 3:58 AM
> To: Dylan Bouterse; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Stock spam in images
>
> This has been covered so many times on this list.
>
> 1: if
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:05:38AM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Would it also be possible to create a rule that matches on text rendered
> specifically from a non-text part and not the whole body? That way you
You'd have to do that in a plugin, but otherwise, sure. There's currently no
meth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randal, Phil wrote:
> This has been covered so many times on this list.
>
> 1: if you're not on spamassassin 3.1.5 get it now, and run
> sa-update (via a cron job daily, but test first with a manual
> sa-update -D)
>
> 2: pop over to http://www.rules
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:18:58PM +0100, Randal, Phil wrote:
>>> undetected). Wouldn't it be better to inject the detected
>>> text back to SA? There should be enough variants of spam
>>> worlds to let SA fuzzily catch the one
> > ...omissis...
> >
> > How about the FuzzyOCR plugin? That has been discussed quite a bit
> > here recently.
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
> >
> > --
> > Bowie
>
> And, by the way, it seems to work!
>
> Actually, the only limit I see is the own-made FuzzyOcr.words
>
Newbie is a derogatory term and to call yourself a newbie is like calling
yourself a moron(no offense).
>From Wiki:
A newbie is a newcomer to a particular field, the term being commonly used
on the Internet, where it might refer to new, inexperienced, or ignorant
users of a game, a newsgroup, an o
ner.
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Fabien GARZIANO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 October 2006 16:11
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Stock spam in images
>
>
> Too bad
Stuart Johnston wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:18:58PM +0100, Randal, Phil wrote:
undetected). Wouldn't it be better to inject the detected text back
to SA? There should be enough variants of spam worlds to let SA
fuzzily catch the ones from images.
I think so.
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:18:58PM +0100, Randal, Phil wrote:
undetected). Wouldn't it be better to inject the detected
text back to SA? There should be enough variants of spam
worlds to let SA fuzzily catch the ones from images.
I think so. Some of the words would be p
sleep
-Message d'origine-
De : Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 2 octobre 2006 16:19
À : users@spamassassin.apache.org
Objet : RE: Stock spam in images
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> And, by the way, it seems to work!
>
> Actually, the only limit I
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:18:58PM +0100, Randal, Phil wrote:
> > undetected). Wouldn't it be better to inject the detected
> > text back to SA? There should be enough variants of spam
> > worlds to let SA fuzzily catch the ones from images.
>
> I think so. Some of the words would be perfectly
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> And, by the way, it seems to work!
>
> Actually, the only limit I see is the own-made FuzzyOcr.words
> (and, maybe, the fact that script text may probably get
> undetected). Wouldn't it be better to inject the detected
> text back to SA? There should be enough vari
This has been covered so many times on this list.
1: if you're not on spamassassin 3.1.5 get it now, and run sa-update
(via a cron job daily, but test first with a manual sa-update -D)
2: pop over to http://www.rulesemporium.com and get an appropriate
selection of their rules, and configure Rul
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 9:46 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Stock spam in images
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> I'm a newbie to the list and have been scanning recent posts to see if
> what I
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> I'm a newbie to the list and have been scanning recent posts to see if
> what I'm about to ask about has been covered but I haven't seen
> anything yet.
>
> Lately I have been getting more and more of the stock alert spam but
> now all the good info is in an image and typic
Have been answered few threads ago and more... May be you didn't scan enough ^^
You can use FuzzyOCR module (But dont ask me how to use, I've never tried ^^)
-Message d'origine-
De : Dylan Bouterse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 2 octobre 2006 15:38
À : users@spamassassin.apa
I keep receiving stock spam that looks like the one below. I was sure I
had same SARE rules that were supposed to catch this, but maybe not.
Any suggestions?
We're working on a set of stock rules. RSN, I hope.
Loren
Hello r,
Thursday, July 14, 2005, 12:37:07 AM, you wrote:
rwac> Hi
rwac> Does anyone have any idea to block the stock spam? I use
rwac> J_CHICKEN_POX ?rules but some stock spam still get through
rwac> inbox.
It depends on why the stock spam is getting through.
7?_sare_bml_*25x.cf (two files, p
> Does anyone have any idea to block the stock spam? I use J_CHICKEN_POX
?rules but some stock spam still get through inbox.
SARE has some rules that help. Not sure which file though.
If you aren't on 3.0, there are also some better rules in the main release
over 2.6x.
Loren
41 matches
Mail list logo
