So, it looks as if I'm misunderstanding the issue.
Per a private email, the dependency will only come into play for
amavisd-new if it's detected to be in use.
Thus, if I'm understanding correctly, if you use amavisd-new, it'll
force a dependency of 2.6.4, but if you don't have amavisd-new
install
Kurt,
> Any thoughts about interoperability with Maia Mailguard?
> Wouldn't forcing a dependency on amavisd-new break that?
No. Maia split from amavisd-new somewhere around 2.2.1.
> Any thoughts about interoperability with Maia Mailguard?
See also:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:57, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 2/1/10 11:42 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>>>
>>> Any adjustments required in amavisd-new?
>>>
>>
>> No, should be fine with 2.6.4. Some of the new 3.3.0 features are
>> already recognized and used by this version. See also my posting
>> on
On 2/1/10 11:42 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Any adjustments required in amavisd-new?
No, should be fine with 2.6.4. Some of the new 3.3.0 features are
already recognized and used by this version. See also my posting
on the amavis list:
http://marc.info/?l=amavis-user&m=126452700028360
Michael Scheidell wrote:
I am almost ready to post the pr to upgrade SA 3.2.5 to SA 3.3.0 which
is the first step in getting the SA 3.30 port officially on FreeBsd
ports system.
Prior to this, please update your dependencies, specifically, upgrade
p5-Mail-DKIM to at least 0.37, and if you are u
> Any adjustments required in amavisd-new?
No, should be fine with 2.6.4. Some of the new 3.3.0 features are
already recognized and used by this version. See also my posting
on the amavis list:
http://marc.info/?l=amavis-user&m=126452700028360
For other versions the release notes tell:
- ve
-- Original Message --
From: Michael Scheidell
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:11:36 -0500
>I am almost ready to post the pr to upgrade SA 3.2.5 to SA 3.3.0 which
>is the first step in getting the SA 3.30 port officially on FreeBsd
>ports system.
>Prior to thi